security-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: RFR: 8285827: Describe the keystore.pkcs12.legacy system property in the java.security file Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8285827: Describe the keystore.pkcs12.legacy system property in the java.security file [v2] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8285827: Describe the keystore.pkcs12.legacy system property in the java.security file [v2] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8285827: Describe the keystore.pkcs12.legacy system property in the java.security file [v2] Sean Mullan
  • Integrated: 8285827: Describe the keystore.pkcs12.legacy system property in the java.security file Weijun Wang
• RFR: 8285785: CheckCleanerBound test fails with PasswordCallback object is not released Xue-Lei Andrew Fan
  • Re: RFR: 8285785: CheckCleanerBound test fails with PasswordCallback object is not released Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8285785: CheckCleanerBound test fails with PasswordCallback object is not released Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8285785: CheckCleanerBound test fails with PasswordCallback object is not released Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8285785: CheckCleanerBound test fails with PasswordCallback object is not released Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8285785: CheckCleanerBound test fails with PasswordCallback object is not released Xue-Lei Andrew Fan
  • Integrated: 8285785: CheckCleanerBound test fails with PasswordCallback object is not released Xue-Lei Andrew Fan
  • Re: RFR: 8285785: CheckCleanerBound test fails with PasswordCallback object is not released Xue-Lei Andrew Fan
• Re: [openjdk/jdk] JDK-6782021: It is not possible to read local computer certificates with the SunMSCAPI provider (PR #8211) Bernd Eckenfels
• RFR: 8285696: AlgorithmConstraints:permits not throwing IllegalArgumentException when 'alg' is null Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8285696: AlgorithmConstraints:permits not throwing IllegalArgumentException when 'alg' is null Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8285696: AlgorithmConstraints:permits not throwing IllegalArgumentException when 'alg' is null Xue-Lei Andrew Fan
  • Re: RFR: 8285696: AlgorithmConstraints:permits not throwing IllegalArgumentException when 'alg' is null [v2] Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8285696: AlgorithmConstraints:permits not throwing IllegalArgumentException when 'alg' is null [v2] Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8285696: AlgorithmConstraints:permits not throwing IllegalArgumentException when 'alg' is null [v2] Xue-Lei Andrew Fan
  • Integrated: 8285696: AlgorithmConstraints:permits not throwing IllegalArgumentException when 'alg' is null Daniel Jeliński
• RFR: 8285683: Missing @ since 11 in java.security.spec.MGF1ParameterSpec fields Bradford Wetmore
  • Re: RFR: 8285683: Missing @ since 11 in java.security.spec.MGF1ParameterSpec fields Hai-May Chao
  • Re: RFR: 8285683: Missing @ since 11 in java.security.spec.MGF1ParameterSpec fields Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8285683: Missing @ since 11 in java.security.spec.MGF1ParameterSpec fields Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8285683: Missing @ since 11 in java.security.spec.MGF1ParameterSpec fields Bradford Wetmore
  • Re: RFR: 8285683: Missing @ since 11 in java.security.spec.MGF1ParameterSpec fields Xue-Lei Andrew Fan
  • Re: RFR: 8285683: Missing @ since 11 in java.security.spec.MGF1ParameterSpec fields Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8285683: Missing @ since 11 in java.security.spec.MGF1ParameterSpec fields [v3] Bradford Wetmore
  • Re: RFR: 8285683: Missing @ since 11 in java.security.spec.MGF1ParameterSpec fields [v2] Bradford Wetmore
  • Re: RFR: 8285683: Missing @ since 11 in java.security.spec.MGF1ParameterSpec fields [v3] Bradford Wetmore
  • Re: RFR: 8285683: Missing @ since 11 in java.security.spec.MGF1ParameterSpec fields [v3] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8285683: Missing @ since 11 in java.security.spec.MGF1ParameterSpec fields [v4] Bradford Wetmore
  • Integrated: 8285683: Missing @ since 11 in java.security.spec.MGF1ParameterSpec fields Bradford Wetmore
• RFR: JDK-8285676: Add missing @param tags for type parameters on classes and interfaces Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285676: Add missing @param tags for type parameters on classes and interfaces Bradford Wetmore
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285676: Add missing @param tags for type parameters on classes and interfaces Jonathan Gibbons
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285676: Add missing @param tags for type parameters on classes and interfaces Stuart Marks
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285676: Add missing @param tags for type parameters on classes and interfaces Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285676: Add missing @param tags for type parameters on classes and interfaces [v2] Stuart Marks
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285676: Add missing @param tags for type parameters on classes and interfaces [v3] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285676: Add missing @param tags for type parameters on classes and interfaces Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285676: Add missing @param tags for type parameters on classes and interfaces Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285676: Add missing @param tags for type parameters on classes and interfaces [v2] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285676: Add missing @param tags for type parameters on classes and interfaces Pavel Rappo
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285676: Add missing @param tags for type parameters on classes and interfaces [v2] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285676: Add missing @param tags for type parameters on classes and interfaces [v3] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285676: Add missing @param tags for type parameters on classes and interfaces [v3] Phil Race
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285676: Add missing @param tags for type parameters on classes and interfaces [v3] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285676: Add missing @param tags for type parameters on classes and interfaces [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285676: Add missing @param tags for type parameters on classes and interfaces [v3] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285676: Add missing @param tags for type parameters on classes and interfaces [v3] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285676: Add missing @param tags for type parameters on classes and interfaces [v4] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285676: Add missing @param tags for type parameters on classes and interfaces [v4] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285676: Add missing @param tags for type parameters on classes and interfaces [v4] Mandy Chung
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285676: Add missing @param tags for type parameters on classes and interfaces [v5] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285676: Add missing @param tags for type parameters on classes and interfaces [v5] Andrey Turbanov
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285676: Add missing @param tags for type parameters on classes and interfaces [v5] Mandy Chung
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285676: Add missing @param tags for type parameters on classes and interfaces [v5] Pavel Rappo
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285676: Add missing @param tags for type parameters on classes and interfaces [v5] Pavel Rappo
  • Integrated: JDK-8285676: Add missing @param tags for type parameters on classes and interfaces Joe Darcy
• CVE-2022-21449: Psychic Signatures in Java Michael StJohns
  • Re: CVE-2022-21449: Psychic Signatures in Java Bernd Eckenfels
• zlib before 1.2.12 allows memory corruption (CVE-2018-25032) Vitaly Provodin
  • Re: zlib before 1.2.12 allows memory corruption (CVE-2018-25032) Bradford Wetmore
  • Re: zlib before 1.2.12 allows memory corruption (CVE-2018-25032) Bernd Eckenfels
  • Re: zlib before 1.2.12 allows memory corruption (CVE-2018-25032) Volker Simonis
  • Re: zlib before 1.2.12 allows memory corruption (CVE-2018-25032) Vitaly Provodin
• RFR: 8285493: ECC calculation error Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8285493: ECC calculation error Xue-Lei Andrew Fan
  • Re: RFR: 8285493: ECC calculation error Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8285493: ECC calculation error Xue-Lei Andrew Fan
  • Re: RFR: 8285493: ECC calculation error Xue-Lei Andrew Fan
  • Re: RFR: 8285493: ECC calculation error Rajan Halade
  • Re: RFR: 8285493: ECC calculation error Anthony Scarpino
  • Integrated: 8285493: ECC calculation error Weijun Wang
• [no subject] Lilian Castro
• RFR: 8253176: Signature.getParameters should specify that it can throw UnsupportedOperationException Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8253176: Signature.getParameters should specify that it can throw UnsupportedOperationException Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8253176: Signature.getParameters should specify that it can throw UnsupportedOperationException Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8253176: Signature.getParameters should specify that it can throw UnsupportedOperationException [v2] Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8253176: Signature.getParameters should specify that it can throw UnsupportedOperationException [v2] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8253176: Signature.getParameters should specify that it can throw UnsupportedOperationException [v2] Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8253176: Signature.getParameters should specify that it can throw UnsupportedOperationException [v2] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8253176: Signature.getParameters should specify that it can throw UnsupportedOperationException [v2] Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8253176: Signature.getParameters should specify that it can throw UnsupportedOperationException [v2] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8253176: Signature.getParameters should specify that it can throw UnsupportedOperationException [v2] Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8253176: Signature.getParameters should specify that it can throw UnsupportedOperationException [v2] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8253176: Signature.getParameters should specify that it can throw UnsupportedOperationException [v2] Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8253176: Signature.getParameters should specify that it can throw UnsupportedOperationException [v2] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8253176: Signature.getParameters should specify that it can throw UnsupportedOperationException [v2] Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8253176: Signature.getParameters should specify that it can throw UnsupportedOperationException [v2] Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8253176: Signature.getParameters should specify that it can throw UnsupportedOperationException [v2] Xue-Lei Andrew Fan
  • Re: RFR: 8253176: Signature.getParameters should specify that it can throw UnsupportedOperationException [v2] Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8253176: Signature.getParameters should specify that it can throw UnsupportedOperationException [v2] Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8253176: Signature.getParameters should specify that it can throw UnsupportedOperationException [v2] Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8253176: Signature.getParameters should specify that it can throw UnsupportedOperationException [v2] Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8253176: Signature.getParameters should specify that it can throw UnsupportedOperationException [v2] Xue-Lei Andrew Fan
  • Re: RFR: 8253176: Signature.getParameters should specify that it can throw UnsupportedOperationException [v2] Xue-Lei Andrew Fan
  • Re: RFR: 8253176: Signature.getParameters should specify that it can throw UnsupportedOperationException [v2] Xue-Lei Andrew Fan
  • Re: RFR: 8253176: Signature.getParameters should specify that it can throw UnsupportedOperationException [v2] Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8253176: Signature.getParameters should specify that it can throw UnsupportedOperationException [v2] Xue-Lei Andrew Fan
  • Re: RFR: 8253176: Signature.getParameters should specify that it can throw UnsupportedOperationException [v2] Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8253176: Signature.getParameters should specify that it can throw UnsupportedOperationException [v2] Xue-Lei Andrew Fan
  • Re: RFR: 8253176: Signature.getParameters should specify that it can throw UnsupportedOperationException [v2] Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8253176: Signature.getParameters should specify that it can throw UnsupportedOperationException [v2] Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8253176: Signature.getParameters should specify that it can throw UnsupportedOperationException [v3] Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8253176: Signature.getParameters should specify that it can throw UnsupportedOperationException [v4] Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8253176: Signature.getParameters should specify that it can throw UnsupportedOperationException [v4] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8253176: Signature.getParameters should specify that it can throw UnsupportedOperationException [v4] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8253176: Signature.getParameters should specify that it can throw UnsupportedOperationException [v4] Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8253176: Signature.getParameters should specify that it can throw UnsupportedOperationException [v4] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8253176: Signature.getParameters should specify that it can throw UnsupportedOperationException [v4] Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8253176: Signature.getParameters should specify that it can throw UnsupportedOperationException [v4] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8253176: Signature.getParameters should specify that it can throw UnsupportedOperationException [v4] Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8253176: Signature.getParameters should specify that it can throw UnsupportedOperationException [v5] Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8253176: Signature.getParameters should specify that it can throw UnsupportedOperationException [v5] Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8253176: Signature.getParameters should specify that it can throw UnsupportedOperationException [v6] Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8253176: Signature.getParameters should specify that it can throw UnsupportedOperationException [v7] Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8253176: Signature.getParameters should specify that it can throw UnsupportedOperationException [v7] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8253176: Signature.getParameters should specify that it can throw UnsupportedOperationException [v7] Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8253176: Signature.getParameters should specify that it can throw UnsupportedOperationException [v7] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8253176: Signature.getParameters should specify that it can throw UnsupportedOperationException [v7] Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8253176: Signature.getParameters should specify that it can throw UnsupportedOperationException [v8] Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8253176: Signature.getParameters should specify that it can throw UnsupportedOperationException [v9] Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8253176: Signature.getParameters should specify that it can throw UnsupportedOperationException [v9] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8253176: Signature.getParameters should specify that it can throw UnsupportedOperationException [v9] Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8253176: Signature.getParameters should specify that it can throw UnsupportedOperationException [v10] Valerie Peng
  • Integrated: 8253176: Signature.getParameters should specify that it can throw UnsupportedOperationException Valerie Peng
• Timeframe for JEP-411 completely removing SecurityManager APIs Scott Stark
  • Re: Timeframe for JEP-411 completely removing SecurityManager APIs Sean Mullan
  • Re: Timeframe for JEP-411 completely removing SecurityManager APIs Scott Stark
  • Re: Timeframe for JEP-411 completely removing SecurityManager APIs Sean Mullan
  • Re: Timeframe for JEP-411 completely removing SecurityManager APIs Peter Firmstone
  • Re: Timeframe for JEP-411 completely removing SecurityManager APIs arjan tijms
  • Re: Timeframe for JEP-411 completely removing SecurityManager APIs Peter Firmstone
• Reproducer for JDK-8221218 Flavia Rainone
  • Re: Reproducer for JDK-8221218 Alan Bateman
  • Re: [Internet]Reproducer for JDK-8221218 xueleifan(XueleiFan)
  • Re: [Internet]Re: Reproducer for JDK-8221218 xueleifan(XueleiFan)
• RFR: JDK-8285504 Minor cleanup could be done in javax.net Mark Powers
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285504 Minor cleanup could be done in javax.net Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285504 Minor cleanup could be done in javax.net Mark Powers
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285504 Minor cleanup could be done in javax.net [v2] Mark Powers
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285504 Minor cleanup could be done in javax.net [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285504 Minor cleanup could be done in javax.net [v2] Mark Powers
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285504 Minor cleanup could be done in javax.net [v2] Bradford Wetmore
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285504 Minor cleanup could be done in javax.net [v2] Mark Powers
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285504 Minor cleanup could be done in javax.net [v2] Bradford Wetmore
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285504 Minor cleanup could be done in javax.net [v2] Mark Powers
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285504 Minor cleanup could be done in javax.net [v2] Bradford Wetmore
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285504 Minor cleanup could be done in javax.net [v2] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285504 Minor cleanup could be done in javax.net [v2] Bradford Wetmore
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285504 Minor cleanup could be done in javax.net [v2] Bradford Wetmore
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285504 Minor cleanup could be done in javax.net [v2] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285504 Minor cleanup could be done in javax.net [v2] Mark Powers
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285504 Minor cleanup could be done in javax.net [v2] Mark Powers
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285504 Minor cleanup could be done in javax.net [v2] Mark Powers
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285504 Minor cleanup could be done in javax.net [v2] Mark Powers
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285504 Minor cleanup could be done in javax.net [v2] Mark Powers
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285504 Minor cleanup could be done in javax.net [v3] Mark Powers
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285504 Minor cleanup could be done in javax.net [v4] Mark Powers
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285504 Minor cleanup could be done in javax.net [v4] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285504 Minor cleanup could be done in javax.net [v4] Bradford Wetmore
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285504 Minor cleanup could be done in javax.net [v4] Mark Powers
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285504 Minor cleanup could be done in javax.net [v4] Bradford Wetmore
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285504 Minor cleanup could be done in javax.net [v4] Bradford Wetmore
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285504 Minor cleanup could be done in javax.net [v4] Mark Powers
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285504 Minor cleanup could be done in javax.net [v4] Bradford Wetmore
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285504 Minor cleanup could be done in javax.net [v4] Mark Powers
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285504 Minor cleanup could be done in javax.net [v4] Mark Powers
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285504 Minor cleanup could be done in javax.net [v4] Bradford Wetmore
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285504 Minor cleanup could be done in javax.net [v5] Mark Powers
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285504 Minor cleanup could be done in javax.net [v5] Bradford Wetmore
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8285504 Minor cleanup could be done in javax.net [v5] Bradford Wetmore
  • Integrated: JDK-8285504 Minor cleanup could be done in javax.net Mark Powers
• JDK-8221218 is not yet fixed xueleifan(XueleiFan)
• RFR: 8285516: clearPassword should be called in a finally try block Xue-Lei Andrew Fan
  • Re: RFR: 8285516: clearPassword should be called in a finally try block Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8285516: clearPassword should be called in a finally try block Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8285516: clearPassword should be called in a finally try block Xue-Lei Andrew Fan
  • Re: RFR: 8285516: clearPassword should be called in a finally try block [v2] Xue-Lei Andrew Fan
  • Re: RFR: 8285516: clearPassword should be called in a finally try block [v2] Xue-Lei Andrew Fan
  • Re: RFR: 8285516: clearPassword should be called in a finally try block [v2] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8285516: clearPassword should be called in a finally try block [v2] Xue-Lei Andrew Fan
  • Re: RFR: 8285516: clearPassword should be called in a finally try block [v2] Hai-May Chao
  • Re: RFR: 8285516: clearPassword should be called in a finally try block [v3] Xue-Lei Andrew Fan
  • Re: RFR: 8285516: clearPassword should be called in a finally try block [v3] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8285516: clearPassword should be called in a finally try block [v3] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8285516: clearPassword should be called in a finally try block [v3] Sean Mullan
  • Integrated: 8285516: clearPassword should be called in a finally try block Xue-Lei Andrew Fan
• RFR: 8285389: EdDSA trimming zeros Anthony Scarpino
  • Re: RFR: 8285389: EdDSA trimming zeros Xue-Lei Andrew Fan
  • Re: RFR: 8285389: EdDSA trimming zeros Anthony Scarpino
  • Re: RFR: 8285389: EdDSA trimming zeros Xue-Lei Andrew Fan
  • Re: RFR: 8285389: EdDSA trimming zeros Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8285389: EdDSA trimming zeros Xue-Lei Andrew Fan
  • Re: [Internet]JDK-8221218 - Insufficient buffer remaining for AEAD cipher fragment (2). Needs to be more than tag size (16) xueleifan(XueleiFan)
  • Re: RFR: 8285389: EdDSA trimming zeros Xue-Lei Andrew Fan
  • Re: [Internet]Re: JDK-8221218 - Insufficient buffer remaining for AEAD cipher fragment (2). Needs to be more than tag size (16) xueleifan(XueleiFan)

• Earlier messages
• Later messages