On 1/7/2015 1:06 PM, Jamil Nimeh wrote: > I did a similar doc bug fix in the past and one of the comments > suggested using the tools variant of the RFC page. The table of > contents links and links to errata and so forth are nice. So I figured > I'd do the same thing here as last time. If it's a problem I can switch > back to the ASCII version. > It's OK. I just want to learn more about the background history.
Thanks, Xuelei > --Jamil > > > -------- Original message -------- > From: Xuelei Fan <xuelei....@oracle.com> > Date: 01/06/2015 7:24 PM (GMT-08:00) > To: security-dev@openjdk.java.net > Subject: Re: RFR [JDK-9]: JDK-8058912 : Broken link (access denied > error) to http://www.rsasecurity.com in RC5ParameterSpec class summary > > Looks fine to me. > > Just curious, why update the link of > "http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2040.txt";? The link works. > > Thanks, > Xuelei > > On 1/7/2015 10:59 AM, Jamil Nimeh wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> This is a quick fix to deal with a broken link for the RC5ParameterSpec >> javadoc. >> >> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8058912 >> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jnimeh/reviews/8058912/webrev.01/ >> >> Thanks! >> --Jamil >
