A IETF workgroup uses the following style for its documentation:
plain text:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc<num>.txt
pdf:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/pdfrfc/rfc<num>.txt.pdf
html:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc<num>
For Java docs, I think the html version may be better to track the
history and links.
Xuelei
On 1/7/2015 3:49 PM, Weijun Wang wrote:
> On 1/7/2015 14:26, Michael StJohns wrote:
>> Actually,www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc<num>.txt is probably a better long
>> term normative reference for documents in the RFC series.
>
> Why?
>
> I think Jamil's tools.ietf.org/html/rfc<num> is better. The xml2rfc tool
> generates this style.
>
> --Max
>
>>
>> Mike
