Hi Max,

Thanks for your comments ,please check updated webrev and my replies inline.
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~amjiang/8050427/webrev.02/

Regards,
Amanda

On 8/17/15, 12:29 AM, Weijun Wang wrote:
There are something I don't understand.

MyConfiguration.java:

- optionOrder: Is it possible to make this an argument of the constructor?
    Fixed, made this an argument of the constructor.

- getConfiguration/setConfiguration: If these are useless, why adding these methods?
    Removed useless methods.

SmartLoginModule.java:

- initialize: Why don't you use the callbackHandler argument?
    See below.

- shouldSucceed: It is always very confusing to make a field accessible from outside a class.
Originally the test tried to test with different password , "shouldSucceed" is used to control which password will be set. MycallbackHandler is called in initialize( ) method and "shouldSucceed" is parsed as an argument to control which password would be set to "PasswdCallback"

 123         this.callbackHandler = new MyCallbackHandler(myUsername, 
myPassword,
 124                 shouldSucceed);

 341     public MyCallbackHandler(String username, char[] password, boolean 
action) {
 342         super();
 343         userName = username;
 344         this.password = password;
 345         this.action = action;
 346     }

 361                 PasswordCallback pc = (PasswordCallback) callback;
 362                 if (action) {
 363                     pc.setPassword(password);
 364                 } else {
 365                     pc.setPassword(wrongpd);
 366                 }

I agree with you this may be confusing, so I simplify this test, "shouldSucceed" value is remove, please check updated webrev.

DynamicConfigurationTest.java:

- test: why the if checks are based on both isNegative and success? Why not only on isNegative? If you want to test 2 stages (initialize and login), you can provide 2 isNegative flags.
"success" was for controlling correct/wrong passwords, "isNegative" was for checking if exception is expected. Tests are re-organized , so I do not use these two flags now, please check updated webrev.

Thanks
Max


On 08/17/2015 01:39 PM, Amanda Jiang wrote:
Hi All,

Please be free to review these new tests for Dynamic configuration of
authentication modules.

Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8050427
webrev:http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~amjiang/8050427/webrev.01/


Thanks,
Amanda




Reply via email to