> On Nov 13, 2015, at 7:12 AM, Langer, Christoph <christoph.lan...@sap.com> > wrote: > > Hi Vincent, > > I just updated the changeset with a > testcase:http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~clanger/webrevs/8139436.3/ > > The testcase would run through with or without my patch, unless you specify > the IAIK provider as explained in the test description.
Maybe you can add a simple provider inside the test that mimics the behavior of IAIK's certificate factory? Or just fail immediately? Otherwise few people will run the test like you described, it becomes practically @manual. --Max > > Can the fix be pushed now? > > Thanks > Christoph