The example shows jdk.crypto.pkcs11 is needed, but I still don't know why java.security.jgss is. Can you give another example where jgss must be present?
Thanks Max > 在 2016年9月14日，23:26，Sergei Kovalev <sergei.kova...@oracle.com> 写道： > > Hi Sean, > > I'm working for testing minimal JRE image. If I create custom JRE with > java.base only - the tests fail. To emulate such behavior we can use > "--limit-modules java.base" option. In case if we have no module declaration > in tests header the test fails with, e.g. ClassNotFound exception (see > example in attached log). In case we declare appropriate modules in jtreg > header then jtreg suite skip the test and mark it "not run" in final report. > This help me to clean out all "false positive" error during testing and > reduce time that I spend to failures analysis. > > > 14.09.16 18:20, Sean Mullan wrote: >> Looks fine to me, but can you explain in more detail why the extra >> dependencies are needed, or an example using --limit-modules? These tests >> are not failing regularly now, so when do the missing dependencies cause >> failures? >> >> Thanks, >> Sean >> >>> On 09/13/2016 08:34 AM, Sergei Kovalev wrote: >>> Hello team, >>> >>> This is re-request for review of very small changes. Could somebody take >>> a look? >>> >>> >>> 08.09.16 17:03, Sergei Kovalev wrote: >>>> Hello team, >>>> >>>> Could you please review the fix for below CR: >>>> >>>> Bug ID: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8165689 >>>> WebRev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~skovalev/8165689/webrev.00/ >>>> >>>> Goal: make test possible to run with "--limit-modules" flag. >>>> Summary: added @modules tag into jtreg header if applicable. >>>> >>> > > -- > With best regards, > Sergei > > <ReinitCipher.jtr.txt>
