Sorry I was thinking about another bug on TLS tests -- 8166032. What exception is thrown there if the jgss module is missing?
Thanks Max > 在 2016年9月14日，23:44，Wang Weijun <weijun.w...@oracle.com> 写道： > > The example shows jdk.crypto.pkcs11 is needed, but I still don't know why > java.security.jgss is. Can you give another example where jgss must be > present? > > Thanks > Max > >> 在 2016年9月14日，23:26，Sergei Kovalev <sergei.kova...@oracle.com> 写道： >> >> Hi Sean, >> >> I'm working for testing minimal JRE image. If I create custom JRE with >> java.base only - the tests fail. To emulate such behavior we can use >> "--limit-modules java.base" option. In case if we have no module declaration >> in tests header the test fails with, e.g. ClassNotFound exception (see >> example in attached log). In case we declare appropriate modules in jtreg >> header then jtreg suite skip the test and mark it "not run" in final report. >> This help me to clean out all "false positive" error during testing and >> reduce time that I spend to failures analysis. >> >> >> 14.09.16 18:20, Sean Mullan wrote: >>> Looks fine to me, but can you explain in more detail why the extra >>> dependencies are needed, or an example using --limit-modules? These tests >>> are not failing regularly now, so when do the missing dependencies cause >>> failures? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Sean >>> >>>> On 09/13/2016 08:34 AM, Sergei Kovalev wrote: >>>> Hello team, >>>> >>>> This is re-request for review of very small changes. Could somebody take >>>> a look? >>>> >>>> >>>> 08.09.16 17:03, Sergei Kovalev wrote: >>>>> Hello team, >>>>> >>>>> Could you please review the fix for below CR: >>>>> >>>>> Bug ID: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8165689 >>>>> WebRev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~skovalev/8165689/webrev.00/ >>>>> >>>>> Goal: make test possible to run with "--limit-modules" flag. >>>>> Summary: added @modules tag into jtreg header if applicable. >>>>> >>>> >> >> -- >> With best regards, >> Sergei >> >> <ReinitCipher.jtr.txt>
