Thank you! On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 3:15 PM, Valerie Peng <valerie.p...@oracle.com> wrote:
> > I can push the fix for you after looking it over and running it through > the regular testing process. > Thanks, > Valerie > > > On 1/30/2017 2:13 PM, Chuck Rasbold wrote: > > Thanks, Sean. Waiting for Valerie sounds good to me. > > It has been quite some time since I've had the joy of directly pushing my > own fix. > I can do it myself, or hand it over to the Security team - whatever you > prefer. > > On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 12:08 PM, Sean Mullan <sean.mul...@oracle.com> > wrote: > >> The fix looks ok to me, but I would also like Valerie to review it since >> she is more familiar with this code. >> >> As far as JDK 9 goes, we are in Rampdown Phase 1. According to the rules >> [1], since it is a P3 and is new in JDK 9 we should try to fix this issue >> if we can. >> >> Were you offering to push this fix or did you want someone in the >> Security group to take this over from you? >> >> --Sean >> >> [1] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk9/rdp-1 >> >> >> On 1/30/17 2:24 PM, Chuck Rasbold wrote: >> >>> Here's a tiny fix for an unintended, but clear, performance regression. >>> >>> I'm not familiar of the current criteria for jdk9 changes. Please advise >>> this mostly HotSpot engineer if / how to move forward. >>> >>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rasbold/8173581/webrev.00/ >>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rasbold/8173581/webrev.00/> >>> >> > >