Changes look fine. I will work on integrating this shortly.
Valerie

On 1/30/2017 12:08 PM, Sean Mullan wrote:
The fix looks ok to me, but I would also like Valerie to review it since she is more familiar with this code.

As far as JDK 9 goes, we are in Rampdown Phase 1. According to the rules [1], since it is a P3 and is new in JDK 9 we should try to fix this issue if we can.

Were you offering to push this fix or did you want someone in the Security group to take this over from you?

--Sean

[1] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk9/rdp-1

On 1/30/17 2:24 PM, Chuck Rasbold wrote:
Here's a tiny fix for an unintended, but clear, performance regression.

I'm not familiar of the current criteria for jdk9 changes. Please advise
this mostly HotSpot engineer if / how to move forward.

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rasbold/8173581/webrev.00/
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rasbold/8173581/webrev.00/>

Reply via email to