Would it be possible (in the future) for 2 modules to use the same name for a private package? If yes, we can dup the sun.security.action classes into java.security.jgss without having to modify all calls.
--Max > On Aug 27, 2018, at 5:13 PM, Alan Bateman <alan.bate...@oracle.com> wrote: > > On 13/08/2018 20:11, Sean Mullan wrote: >> : >> >> Also, this change puts more of a dependency on sun.security.action which I >> think we want to avoid, as it would be nice to eventually stop exporting >> sun.security.action so as to minimize the exports from java.base to the >> java.security.jgss module. You can double-check with Mandy or Alan on >> whether my line of thinking is correct on that. > We should at least drop the exporting to java.desktop. The exporting to > java.security.jgss would be good to remove too but that module is deeply tied > to the sun.security.* implementation and would be a significant effort to > re-implement. > > -Alan
