On 11/1/18 1:29 AM, dean.l...@oracle.com wrote:
On 10/31/18 9:39 PM, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dlong/8212605/webrev.1/src/java.base/share/classes/java/security/AccessController.java.udiff.html
In checkContext should the security manager be null checked first
instead of last to optimize for the typical case? (If the side effects
in that expression are desired it should be documented)
I was following the example of createWrapper. The side-effects of
getInnocuousAcc() will only happen once, so the order shouldn't matter
here, except for performance reasons. I don't have a strong opinion
about the order, but it looks like the typical case for createWrapper
would also be the typical case for checkContext, so maybe they both
should be changed, if indeed a null security manager is the more typical
case.
A null SM should be the more common case. I am ok with changing the
order so the SM is checked first, but it should be done in both the
createWrapper and checkContext methods. Alternatively, we could see if
they could be combined to eliminate the duplicate code but that might
not be practical from looking at them.
--Sean