On Tue, 29 Mar 2022 22:47:21 GMT, Valerie Peng <valer...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Can someone help review this update to the PSSParameterSpec class regarding
>> the constructor with int argument and the DEFAULT static field? Just added
>> @Deprecate javadoc tag and caution about their usage as suggested in the bug
>> record.
>>
>> A CSR will be filed once the wording changes are reviewed.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Valerie
>
> Valerie Peng has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
> Changed the PSSParameterSpec javadoc link to show arguments.
Marked as reviewed by mullan (Reviewer).
src/java.base/share/classes/java/security/spec/PSSParameterSpec.java line 105:
> 103: * standard for more details. Thus, it is recommended to
> create
> 104: * a new {@code PSSParameterSpec} with the desired parameter
> values
> 105: * using
s/using/using the/
src/java.base/share/classes/java/security/spec/PSSParameterSpec.java line 174:
> 172: * <a href="https://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc8017.txt";>PKCS#1
> v2.2</a>
> 173: * standard for more details. Thus, it is recommended to
> explicitly
> 174: * specify all desired parameter values with
s/with/with the/
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/7913
