On Thu, 9 Jun 2022 21:00:55 GMT, Sean Mullan <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hai-May Chao has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional
>> commits since the last revision:
>>
>> - Inconsistent entries test
>> - Inconsistent entries test
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/javax/crypto/CryptoPolicyParser.java line 202:
>
>> 200: if (!processedPermissions.isEmpty()) {
>> 201: throw new ParsingException(st.lineno(), "Inconsistent
>> policy");
>> 202: }
>
> Instead of setting the `allPermEntryFound` flag, what if you instead put an
> entry for `CryptoAllPermission.ALG_NAME` in `processedPermissions` here. Then
> if there are more entries after this, I think `isConsistent` will catch it in
> the following code:
>
>
> if (processedPermissions.containsKey(CryptoAllPermission.ALG_NAME)) {
> return false;
> }
Yes, with the `allPermEntryFound` flag, the current fix would not require to
put the `javax.crypto.CryptoAllPermission` entry in `processedPermissions`. So
`processedPermissions` will be used to keep `javax.crypto.CryptoPermission`
entries and is updated by `isConsistent()`, and no need to deal with
`javax.crypto.CryptoAllPermission` entry. I’d like to keep it as-is if there is
no objection.
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/8985
