On Wed, 29 May 2024 18:53:55 GMT, Anthony Scarpino <ascarp...@openjdk.org> 
wrote:

> Hi
> 
> This change is to improve TLS 1.3 session resumption by allowing a TLS server 
> to send more than one resumption ticket per connection and clients to store 
> more.  Resumption is a quick way to use an existing TLS session to establish 
> another session by avoiding the long TLS full handshake process.  In TLS 1.2 
> and below, clients can repeatedly resume a session by using the session ID 
> from an established connection.  In TLS 1.3, a one-time "resumption ticket" 
> is sent by the server after the TLS connection has been established.  The 
> server may send multiple resumption tickets to help clients that rapidly 
> resume connections.  If the client does not have another resumption ticket, 
> it must go through the full TLS handshake again.  The current implementation 
> in JDK 23 and below, only sends and store one resumption ticket.
> 
> The number of resumption tickets a server can send should be configurable by 
> the application developer or administrator. [RFC 
> 8446](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8446) does not specify a default 
> value.  A system property called `jdk.tls.server.newSessionTicketCount` 
> allows the user to change the number of resumption tickets sent by the 
> server.  If this property is not set or given an invalid value, the default 
> value of 3 is used. Further details are in the CSR.
> 
> A large portion of the changeset is on the client side by changing the 
> caching system used by TLS.  It creates a new `CacheEntry<>` type called 
> `QueueCacheEntry<>` that will store multiple values for a Map entry.

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: 0c2b1758
Author:    Anthony Scarpino <ascarp...@openjdk.org>
URL:       
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/commit/0c2b175898d13b58ffe56e2f9cbc9d88173a61cf
Stats:     1286 lines in 16 files changed: 995 ins; 134 del; 157 mod

8328608: Multiple NewSessionTicket support for TLS

Reviewed-by: djelinski

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19465

Reply via email to