On Wed, 13 Nov 2024 23:38:30 GMT, Vladimir Ivanov <vaiva...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> This patch remove access to the shared variable to fix scalability issue in >> the multithread environment. According to testing by the >> specjvm2008::crypto.rsa the one thread performance reduced for less than 1% >> while the score for the multithread run increased in ~2x. For the 2 socket >> system with Xeon 8480+ numbers looks as: >> • 1 thread: 643.15 for original version vs 642.54 for patched one; >> • 224 threads: 22446.19 for original vs 46147.41 for patched. >> The RSABench microbenchmark reports no score changes for the 1 thread >> (average for all testcases) and 2.4% improvement for the 224 threads. > > Vladimir Ivanov has updated the pull request incrementally with one > additional commit since the last revision: > > 8317538: Potential bottleneck in Provider::getService: > specjvm2008::crypto.rsa have scalability issue for high vCPU numbers The ThreadLocal variable has similar compiler warning. With the field declared as: === private ThreadLocal<ServiceKey> previousKey = new ThreadLocal<ServiceKey>(); Compiler for call 'previousKey.get();' reports: === Output from failing command(s) repeated here === * For target jdk_modules_java.base__the.java.base_batch: jdk/src/java.base/share/classes/java/security/Provider.java:1284: warning: [serial] non-transient instance field of a serializable class declared with a non-serializable type ServiceKey key = previousKey.get(); Could you add some words about scenario when 'transient' modifier leads to problem? For now this field also not serialized. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21719#issuecomment-2475182230