security-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v4] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v4] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v5] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v5] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v5] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v6] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v7] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v7] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v7] jonghoonpark
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v7] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v7] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v8] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v8] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v8] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v8] Manuel Hässig
  • Integrated: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Manuel Hässig
• RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections Stuart Marks
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections Stuart Marks
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections Jan Lahoda
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections [v3] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections [v4] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections [v4] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections [v4] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections [v4] Stuart Marks
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections [v2] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections [v3] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections [v4] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections [v4] ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections [v4] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections [v4] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections [v4] Rémi Forax
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections [v4] ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8384430: Use Set.of() instead of collections.unmodifiableSet() in some older code sections [v4] Kevin Walls
• RFR: 8371305: X25519 should utilize intrinsics Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8371305: X25519 should utilize intrinsics [v2] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8371305: X25519 should utilize intrinsics [v3] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8371305: X25519 should utilize x86 intrinsics [v3] Volodymyr Paprotski
  • Re: RFR: 8371305: X25519 should utilize x86 intrinsics [v3] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8371305: X25519 should utilize x86 intrinsics [v3] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8371305: X25519 should utilize x86 intrinsics [v3] Andrew Dinn
  • Re: RFR: 8371305: X25519 should utilize x86 intrinsics [v3] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8371305: X25519 should utilize x86 intrinsics [v4] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8371305: X25519 should utilize x86 intrinsics [v4] Volodymyr Paprotski
  • Re: RFR: 8371305: X25519 should utilize x86 intrinsics [v4] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8371305: X25519 should utilize x86 intrinsics [v5] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8371305: X25519 should utilize x86 intrinsics [v5] Volodymyr Paprotski
  • Re: RFR: 8371305: X25519 should utilize x86 intrinsics [v6] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8371305: X25519 should utilize x86 intrinsics [v6] Anthony Scarpino
  • Re: RFR: 8371305: X25519 should utilize x86 intrinsics [v6] Volodymyr Paprotski
  • Re: RFR: 8371305: X25519 should utilize x86 intrinsics [v6] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8371305: X25519 should utilize x86 intrinsics [v7] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8371305: X25519 should utilize x86 intrinsics [v7] Anthony Scarpino
  • Re: RFR: 8371305: X25519 should utilize x86 intrinsics [v7] Volodymyr Paprotski
  • Re: RFR: 8371305: X25519 should utilize x86 intrinsics [v7] duke
  • Re: RFR: 8371305: X25519 should utilize x86 intrinsics [v7] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8371305: X25519 should utilize x86 intrinsics [v7] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8371305: X25519 should utilize x86 intrinsics [v7] Sean Mullan
  • Integrated: 8371305: X25519 should utilize x86 intrinsics Shawn Emery
• RFR: 8384371: CngCipher and DupAlias tests fail on Windows Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8384371: CngCipher and DupAlias tests fail on Windows Mikhail Yankelevich
  • Re: RFR: 8384371: CngCipher and DupAlias tests fail on Windows [v2] Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8384371: CngCipher and DupAlias tests fail on Windows [v2] Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8384371: CngCipher and DupAlias tests fail on Windows [v2] Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8384371: CngCipher and DupAlias tests fail on Windows [v2] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8384371: CngCipher and DupAlias tests fail on Windows [v2] Mikhail Yankelevich
  • Re: RFR: 8384371: CngCipher and DupAlias tests fail on Windows [v2] Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8384371: CngCipher and DupAlias tests fail on Windows [v3] Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8384371: CngCipher and DupAlias tests fail on Windows [v3] Mikhail Yankelevich
  • Re: RFR: 8384371: CngCipher and DupAlias tests fail on Windows [v3] Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8384371: CngCipher and DupAlias tests fail on Windows [v4] Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8384371: CngCipher and DupAlias tests fail on Windows [v4] Mikhail Yankelevich
  • Re: RFR: 8384371: CngCipher and DupAlias tests fail on Windows [v4] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8384371: CngCipher and DupAlias tests fail on Windows [v4] Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8384371: CngCipher and DupAlias tests fail on Windows [v5] Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8384371: CngCipher and DupAlias tests fail on Windows [v5] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8384371: CngCipher and DupAlias tests fail on Windows [v5] duke
  • Integrated: 8384371: CngCipher and DupAlias tests fail on Windows Ashay Rane
• RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements Volodymyr Paprotski
  • Re: RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements Andrew Dinn
  • Re: RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements Volodymyr Paprotski
  • Re: RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements [v2] Andrew Dinn
  • Re: RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements [v2] Volodymyr Paprotski
  • Re: RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements Volodymyr Paprotski
  • Re: RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements Volodymyr Paprotski
  • Re: RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements [v5] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements [v2] Ferenc Rakoczi
  • Re: RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements [v2] Volodymyr Paprotski
  • Re: RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements [v2] Sandhya Viswanathan
  • Re: RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements [v2] Sandhya Viswanathan
  • Re: RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements [v2] Volodymyr Paprotski
  • Re: RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements [v3] Volodymyr Paprotski
  • Re: RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements [v3] Sandhya Viswanathan
  • Re: RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements [v3] Volodymyr Paprotski
  • Re: RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements [v3] Sandhya Viswanathan
  • Re: RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements [v3] Volodymyr Paprotski
  • Re: RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements [v3] Sandhya Viswanathan
  • Re: RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements [v3] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements [v3] Volodymyr Paprotski
  • Re: RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements [v3] Sandhya Viswanathan
  • Re: RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements [v4] Volodymyr Paprotski
  • Re: RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements [v4] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements [v4] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements [v4] Volodymyr Paprotski
  • Re: RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements [v4] Volodymyr Paprotski
  • Re: RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements [v4] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements [v4] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements [v4] Volodymyr Paprotski
  • Re: RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements [v4] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements [v4] Volodymyr Paprotski
  • Re: RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements [v4] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements [v4] Volodymyr Paprotski
  • Re: RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements [v5] Volodymyr Paprotski
  • Re: RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements [v5] Sandhya Viswanathan
  • Re: RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements [v5] Volodymyr Paprotski
  • Re: RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements [v6] Volodymyr Paprotski
  • Re: RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements [v6] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements [v6] Volodymyr Paprotski
  • Re: RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements [v7] Volodymyr Paprotski
  • Re: RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements [v7] Sandhya Viswanathan
  • Re: RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements [v8] Volodymyr Paprotski
  • Re: RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements [v8] Sandhya Viswanathan
  • Re: RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements [v8] Anthony Scarpino
  • Re: RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements [v8] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements [v8] Volodymyr Paprotski
  • Re: RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements [v8] Martin Doerr
  • Re: RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements [v8] Volodymyr Paprotski
  • Re: RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements [v8] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements [v8] Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements [v8] Martin Doerr
  • Re: RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements [v8] Volodymyr Paprotski
  • Re: RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements [v8] Martin Doerr
  • Re: RFR: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements [v8] Goetz Lindenmaier
  • Integrated: 8384353: SHA3 AVX2 and AVX512 intrinsics and improvements Volodymyr Paprotski
• New candidate JEP: 538: PEM Encodings of Cryptographic Objects Mark Reinhold
• RFR: 8372351: Add 2 WISeKey roots Rajan Halade
  • Re: RFR: 8372351: Add 2 WISeKey roots Sean Mullan
  • Integrated: 8372351: Add 2 WISeKey roots Rajan Halade
• [External] : TImeline for X25519MLKEM768 JSSE backports Childs-Klein, Will
  • Re: [External] : TImeline for X25519MLKEM768 JSSE backports Sean Mullan
• Re: RFR: 8383912: Deduplicate klass fetching and decoding in oopDesc [v3] Aleksey Shipilev
• Re: RFR: 8382042: Add drill-into and path info to ASN1Formatter [v10] Weijun Wang
• RFR: 8383873: SNIWildcardMatching test logs an error instead of failing Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8383873: SNIWildcardMatching test logs an error instead of failing Rajan Halade
  • Re: RFR: 8383873: SNIWildcardMatching test logs an error instead of failing [v2] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8383873: SNIWildcardMatching test logs an error instead of failing [v2] Rajan Halade
  • Re: RFR: 8383873: SNIWildcardMatching test logs an error instead of failing [v2] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8383873: SNIWildcardMatching test logs an error instead of failing [v2] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8383873: SNIWildcardMatching test logs an error instead of failing [v2] Rajan Halade
  • Integrated: 8383873: SNIWildcardMatching test logs an error instead of failing Artur Barashev
• RFR: 8383813: pkcs12 keystore fails to load because of incorrect DER length-encoding Mark Powers
  • Re: RFR: 8383813: pkcs12 keystore fails to load because of incorrect DER length-encoding Mark Powers
  • Re: RFR: 8383813: pkcs12 keystore fails to load because of incorrect DER length-encoding Mikhail Yankelevich
  • Re: RFR: 8383813: pkcs12 keystore fails to load because of incorrect DER length-encoding Mikhail Yankelevich
  • Re: RFR: 8383813: pkcs12 keystore fails to load because of incorrect DER length-encoding Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8383813: pkcs12 keystore fails to load because of incorrect DER length-encoding [v2] Mark Powers
  • Re: RFR: 8383813: pkcs12 keystore fails to load because of incorrect DER length-encoding [v2] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8383813: pkcs12 keystore fails to load because of incorrect DER length-encoding [v2] Mark Powers
  • Re: RFR: 8383813: pkcs12 keystore fails to load because of incorrect DER length-encoding [v2] Mark Powers
  • Re: RFR: 8383813: pkcs12 keystore fails to load because of incorrect DER length-encoding [v2] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8383813: pkcs12 keystore fails to load because of incorrect DER length-encoding [v2] Mikhail Yankelevich
  • Re: RFR: 8383813: pkcs12 keystore fails to load because of incorrect DER length-encoding [v2] Mark Powers
  • Re: RFR: 8383813: pkcs12 keystore fails to load because of incorrect DER length-encoding [v3] Mark Powers
  • Re: RFR: 8383813: pkcs12 keystore fails to load because of incorrect DER length-encoding [v3] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8383813: pkcs12 keystore fails to load because of incorrect DER length-encoding [v3] Mark Powers
  • Re: RFR: 8383813: pkcs12 keystore fails to load because of incorrect DER length-encoding [v4] Mark Powers
  • Re: RFR: 8383813: pkcs12 keystore fails to load because of incorrect DER length-encoding [v4] Mikhail Yankelevich
  • Re: RFR: 8383813: pkcs12 keystore fails to load because of incorrect DER length-encoding [v4] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8383813: pkcs12 keystore fails to load because of incorrect DER length-encoding [v5] Mark Powers
  • Re: RFR: 8383813: pkcs12 keystore fails to load because of incorrect DER length-encoding [v5] Weijun Wang
  • Integrated: 8383813: pkcs12 keystore fails to load because of incorrect DER length-encoding Mark Powers
• Re: RFR: 8382332: Large regression (~50%) in SPECjbb2015 when using JFR after JEP 500 [v5] Markus Grönlund
• Integrated: 8372817: Remove test/jdk/sun/security/rsa silent skips Mikhail Yankelevich
• RFR: 8382442: Make SUN provider configurable so it support non-crypto services only Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8382442: Make SUN provider configurable so it support non-crypto services only Matthew Donovan
  • Re: RFR: 8382442: Make SUN provider configurable so it support non-crypto services only Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8382442: Make SUN provider configurable so it support non-crypto services only [v2] Valerie Peng
  • Re: RFR: 8382442: Make SUN provider configurable so it support non-crypto services only [v2] Mikhail Yankelevich
  • Re: RFR: 8382442: Make SUN provider configurable so it support non-crypto services only [v2] Andrey Turbanov
• RFR: 8383635: Improve performance of ML-KEM's implKyberNttMultJava() method Ferenc Rakoczi
  • Re: RFR: 8383635: Improve performance of ML-KEM's implKyberNttMultJava() method Andrew Dinn
  • Re: RFR: 8383635: Improve performance of ML-KEM's implKyberNttMultJava() method Ferenc Rakoczi
  • Re: RFR: 8383635: Improve performance of ML-KEM's implKyberNttMultJava() method Shawn Emery
  • Re: RFR: 8383635: Improve performance of ML-KEM's implKyberNttMultJava() method [v2] Ferenc Rakoczi
  • Re: RFR: 8383635: Improve performance of ML-KEM's implKyberNttMultJava() method Andrew Haley
  • Re: RFR: 8383635: Improve performance of ML-KEM's implKyberNttMultJava() method Ferenc Rakoczi
  • Re: RFR: 8383635: Improve performance of ML-KEM's implKyberNttMultJava() method Andrew Haley
  • Re: RFR: 8383635: Improve performance of ML-KEM's implKyberNttMultJava() method Ferenc Rakoczi

• Earlier messages
• Later messages