On Thu, 6 Mar 2025 19:57:03 GMT, Sean Mullan <mul...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Artur Barashev has updated the pull request incrementally with one 
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>> 
>>   Update documentation and unit tests to signal TLS scope case-insensitivity
>
> src/java.base/share/conf/security/java.security line 747:
> 
>> 745: #
>> 746: #     HANDSHAKE restricts algorithm to be used for signing TLS 
>> handshake.
>> 747: #     CERTIFICATE restricts algorithm to be used for signatures in 
>> certificates.
> 
> s/HANDSHAKE/'Handshake'/
> s/CERTIFICATE/'Certificate'/
> 
> Suggest slight rewording: "Handshake restricts the use of the algorithm in 
> TLS handshake signatures." and "Certificate restricts the use of the 
> algorithm in certificate signatures."

Done.

> src/java.base/share/conf/security/java.security line 748:
> 
>> 746: #     HANDSHAKE restricts algorithm to be used for signing TLS 
>> handshake.
>> 747: #     CERTIFICATE restricts algorithm to be used for signatures in 
>> certificates.
>> 748: #     These constraints can't be mixed with any other usage constraints 
>> for the
> 
> s/can't/cannot/ (sounds more formal).
> 
> The word "any" seems redundant, suggest removing.

Done.

> src/java.base/share/conf/security/java.security line 752:
> 
>> 750: #     ampersand '&'.
>> 751: #     See https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8446#section-4.2.3 
>> for more
>> 752: #     information on signatures used in TLS handshake and in 
>> certificates.
> 
> I suggest we don't include a reference to the TLS 1.3 RFC. Something like 
> this might be fine for the developer's guide though.

Done.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23681#discussion_r1984007711
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23681#discussion_r1984007560
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23681#discussion_r1984007354

Reply via email to