On Fri, 5 Sep 2025 15:35:02 GMT, Matthew Donovan <mdono...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Jamil Nimeh has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Fix typo in exception message
>
> test/jdk/com/sun/crypto/provider/Cipher/ChaCha20/UpdateAADTest.java line 56:
>
>> 54:
>> 55: public static void main(final String[] args) throws Exception {
>> 56: ByteBuffer twoKBuf = ByteBuffer.allocate(2048);
>
> Is it relevant to include a test case for MemorySegment-backed ByteBuffers?
It depends on how the MemorySegment is made, I think. If something like
`MemorySegment.ofArray(new byte[2048])` were to be used and a ByteBuffer
created from that, I believe the `hasArray()` method would return true and
therefore would fall into this code path.
I'll make a test case using an array-backed MemorySegment and see what happens
with both non-sliced and sliced ByteBuffers are used. I was planning on doing
some rewrites on this test anyway to handle a test case @ferakocz wanted so
I'll include this as well.
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27081#discussion_r2325537785
