On Mon, 24 Nov 2025 21:00:39 GMT, Anthony Scarpino <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Volodymyr Paprotski has updated the pull request incrementally with one >> additional commit since the last revision: >> >> next set of comments > > Marked as reviewed by ascarpino (Reviewer). Oh.. realized that I should had checked JBS.. thanks @ascarpino for resolving the bug I caused! At least its just the option.. whew. > @dholmes-ora Hi David, need some help with this please, don't have access to > an ARM system to reproduce (or the ARM expertise).. could you point me at the > failing job if thats available? Or some log if not? > > * Is it an issue with the options (i.e. `-XX:UseAVX=2` perhaps). I probably > should had added `-XX:+IgnoreUnrecognizedVMOptions` to it.. > * Otherwise, I am stumped.. the test case isn't architecture-specific.. it > calls two methods (one of which is annotated as an intrinsic..) and expects > them to return the same value.. i.e. Java and Intrinsic version should behave > the same.. > * Only thing I can think of.. The ARM implementation took some shortcuts in > name of optimization. This can be entirely valid if the code calling the > intrinsics never should get some specific value (-ranges). i.e. the tests RNG > be further restricted.. > * Otherwise.. is it possible its a bug in the ARM intrinsic? ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28136#issuecomment-3582226267
