On Thu, 20 Nov 2025 13:05:44 GMT, Neha Joshi <[email protected]> wrote:

> In this PR we have updated the code to remove the duplicate call and ensure 
> JVM flags are added only once.
> 
> ### ISSUE :- 
> In the test case --> 
> ProcessTools.createTestJavaProcessBuilder(Utils.addTestJavaOpts("SSLEngineKeyLimit",
>  "p", args[1], args[2]));
>     
> -> Before executing ProcessTools.createTestJavaProcessBuilder() we are 
> calling  ---> Utils.addTestJavaOpts() which internally call 
> prependTestJavaOpts();
> 
>>   public static String[] addTestJavaOpts(String... userArgs) {
>>         return prependTestJavaOpts(userArgs);
>>     }
> 
> -> Then again inside ProcessTools.createTestJavaProcessBuilder() method we 
> are calling Utils.prependTestJavaOpts()
> 
>> public static ProcessBuilder createTestJavaProcessBuilder(String... command) 
>> {
>>         return createJavaProcessBuilder(Utils.prependTestJavaOpts(command));
>>     }
> 
> 
> Calling Utils.prependTestJavaOpts() twice leads to duplicate JVM flags (This 
> method call-> getTestJavaOpts() the main reason for duplication and below is 
> the implementation for the same. )
> 
>> public static String[] getTestJavaOpts() {
>>         List<String> opts = new ArrayList<String>();
>>         Collections.addAll(opts, safeSplitString(VM_OPTIONS));
>>         Collections.addAll(opts, safeSplitString(JAVA_OPTIONS));
>>         return opts.toArray(new String[0]);
>>     }
> 
> Contributed-by: @Korov 
> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/26404
> 
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8362658

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: 520c092a
Author:    Neha Joshi <[email protected]>
Committer: Rajan Halade <[email protected]>
URL:       
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/commit/520c092a658559a5d65f06a51061db3aae09931e
Stats:     36 lines in 8 files changed: 0 ins; 29 del; 7 mod

8362658: sun/security/ssl/SSLEngineImpl/* tests duplicate jvm flags

Co-authored-by: Lei Zhu <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: myankelevich, rhalade

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28428

Reply via email to