On Thu, 30 Apr 2026 08:58:33 GMT, Alan Bateman <[email protected]> wrote:
>> @AlanBateman, I've improved the deprecation message in 34efcd3abc1. I've >> kept the _"[...], which performs stricter checks on the provided hostname."_ >> addendum, to leave the API open for further checks, instead of enumerating >> each (e.g., IP literal checks) and locking the API to only that subset, >> which was the main blocking issue with the existing ctors' API specification >> when we've attemped to re-purpose them. > > The updated description message is good, thanks! > Should we leave the method description alone and simply add an `@deprecated` > note here? @dfuch, your remark above was independently also DM'ed to me by @artur-oracle too. In ffa8a70f67e, I've reverted changes touching to the deprecated ctors. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/30747#discussion_r3207691804
