On Mon, 19 Oct 2026 17:47:47 GMT, Roland Mesde <[email protected]> wrote:

> This PR uses a shared per session family depth limit + per session depth 
> value to enforce invalidation. This will remove the container's 
> (ConcurrentLinkedQueue) strong references to the child sessions, which allows 
> child sessions to be garbage collected when they are no longer reachable. The 
> drawback is that the invalidation depth limit will be per family, so once a 
> session is invalidated at the specified depth, all deeper sessions will be 
> invalidated, not just its descendants.
> 
> Ran related tests on linux-x64, linux-aarch64, macos-aarch64 and windows-x64:
> 
> make test TEST=test/jdk/sun/security/ssl
> make test TEST=test/jdk/javax/net/ssl
> 
> Results:
> 
> [windows-x64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/33689537/windows-x64-specific-test.log)
> [windows-x64-specific-2-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/33689538/windows-x64-specific-2-test.log)
> [macos-aarch64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/33689539/macos-aarch64-specific-test.log)
> [macos-aarch64-specific-2-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/33689540/macos-aarch64-specific-2-test.log)
> [linux-x64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/33689541/linux-x64-specific-test.log)
> [linux-x64-specific-2-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/33689542/linux-x64-specific-2-test.log)
> [linux-aarch64-specific-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/33689543/linux-aarch64-specific-test.log)
> [linux-aarch64-specific-2-test.log](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/33689544/linux-aarch64-specific-2-test.log)
> 
> Low risk - the change is limited to SSLSessionImpl, its cache lookup and the 
> ticket code. The worst case is an occasional extra full handshake.
> 
> ---------
> - [x] I confirm that I make this contribution in accordance with the [OpenJDK 
> Interim AI Policy](https://openjdk.org/legal/ai).

FYI:  I plan to review this eventually, please wait for my review.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/33447#issuecomment-6320605471

Reply via email to