Dims,

thanks for the honour :-). 

However, I spend most of my free cycles to WSS4J 
and the associated Axis handler, documentation etc. 
So I'm not quite sure if I can really contribute 
regularly to XML Sec.

If I spot a problem in other software, e.g. XML Security,
I'll try to fix it and generate a patch or give a
detailed problem report. 

Regards,
Werner



> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Gesendet: Freitag, 19. Dezember 2003 12:26
> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Betreff: Re: AW: [java] Large XML Files ( > 1 MB )
> 
> 
> Axl, Security committers,
> 
> Werner has pending patch
> (http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/ReadMsg?listName=security-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]&msgNo=1679).
> 
> Hint: grow the team :)
> 
> -- dims
> 
> --- Axl Mattheus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> ---------------------------------
>     Werner,
> 
> Help would be nice. No, help would be much appreciated. I am 
> currentlyoccupied elsewhere. The more
> you do, the more you are allowed to do! Gofor it.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Ax/
> 
> Dittmann Werner wrote:
>   
> Axl, all,would be nice if you can do so. Then I can get a 
> freshversion from CVS. Do you plan to
> update other partsof the code? I saw some problems using the 
> internalserializer class (the patch
> addresses only the TEXTnode, not the others). If I can be of 
> any help ....Regards,Werner  
>       
> -----Urspr&uuml;ngliche Nachricht-----Von: Axl Mattheus 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet:
Freitag, 19. Dezember 2003 10:08An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: [java] Large XML Files
( > 1 MB )Erwin,We're testing it like mad. It seems good. It is my plan to check it in 
today if
all goes well.Danke Herr Dittmann.ax/Erwin van der Koogh wrote:    
                  
        Signing large xml file (1,5 MB) took more than 300         
              
MB RAM. Is    
                  
there a way to make it consume less memory?        
            
Well.. there's a patch in CVS from a while back from Sean that improved performance a 
little bit,
but no, at this time       
        
there's little     
          
we can do to make it consume less memory. The entire       
        
document has to     
          
be read into a DOM tree and that has proven to be extremely       
        
memory-heavy.    
          
For the next version we will be in a position to experiment with different algorithms 
a bit more
so things should be improving there.I will try to sit down for a day or so and make a 
next release
over the next couple week so that some of the patches will work.Axl, Berin.. that 
patch that was
send around a few days ago.. is it any good? Can I commit it?Thanks,Erwin      
        
    
    
  



> ATTACHMENT part 2 application/x-pkcs7-signature name=smime.p7s



=====
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/

Reply via email to