I have been looking at the memory consumption using some profiling tools, to see if there are any obvious things we can fix in the short-term. I don't have any patches yet (other than the one I sent in a few weeks ago), but I will keep you informed as I find stuff.
Thanks, Sean
Dittmann Werner wrote:
Dims,
thanks for the honour :-).
However, I spend most of my free cycles to WSS4J and the associated Axis handler, documentation etc. So I'm not quite sure if I can really contribute regularly to XML Sec.
If I spot a problem in other software, e.g. XML Security,
I'll try to fix it and generate a patch or give a
detailed problem report.
Regards, Werner
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Freitag, 19. Dezember 2003 12:26
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: AW: [java] Large XML Files ( > 1 MB )
Axl, Security committers,
Werner has pending patch (http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/ReadMsg?listName=security- [EMAIL PROTECTED]&msgNo=1679).
Hint: grow the team :)
-- dims
--- Axl Mattheus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--------------------------------- Werner,
Help would be nice. No, help would be much appreciated. I am currentlyoccupied elsewhere. The more
you do, the more you are allowed to do! Gofor it.
Thanks
Ax/
Dittmann Werner wrote:
Axl, all,would be nice if you can do so. Then I can get a freshversion from CVS. Do you plan to
update other partsof the code? I saw some problems using the internalserializer class (the patch
addresses only the TEXTnode, not the others). If I can be of any help ....Regards,Werner -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----Von: Axl Mattheus
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet:
Freitag, 19. Dezember 2003 10:08An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: [java] Large XML Files
( > 1 MB )Erwin,We're testing it like mad. It seems good. It is my plan to check it in today if
all goes well.Danke Herr Dittmann.ax/Erwin van der Koogh wrote: Signing large xml file (1,5 MB) took more than 300 MB RAM. Is there a way to make it consume less memory? Well.. there's a patch in CVS from a while back from Sean that improved performance a little bit,
but no, at this time there's little we can do to make it consume less memory. The entire document has to be read into a DOM tree and that has proven to be extremely memory-heavy. For the next version we will be in a position to experiment with different algorithms a bit more
so things should be improving there.I will try to sit down for a day or so and make a next release
over the next couple week so that some of the patches will work.Axl, Berin.. that patch that was
send around a few days ago.. is it any good? Can I commit it?Thanks,Erwin
ATTACHMENT part 2 application/x-pkcs7-signature name=smime.p7s
===== Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
