I may just be an old dog incapable of learning new tricks, but I've had a hard time trying to figure out some things since Xerces moved to Subversion. (I don't remember what specific problems I've had, unfortunately, just that I had a hard time with something that would have been trivial for me with CVS.)
On the other hand, there may be something to be gained by using the same version control system as other Apache projects. This argument would be more convincing to me if there was some official indication that ASF prefers SVN to CVS, but I can't find any such on http://www.apache.org/dev/version-control.html. Is there a compelling reason to make the change? I know SVN is newer and cooler and has some features that are very useful under some circumstances (like member moves), but is there any evidence that this is of value to xml-security? I raise these issues just as food for thought. I don't have a vote or a strong opinion. > -----Original Message----- > From: Berin Lautenbach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 7:40 AM > To: security-dev@xml.apache.org > Subject: SVN > > Not sure if everyone is aware, but the ASF is gradually > converting all > the CVS repos to SVN. > > What are peoples thoughts to moving xml-security to SVN?
