Jesse, FYI, There is a informal deadline for shutting down CVS end of this calendar year. drop a note to infrastructure@ if you need more info and timeline.
-- dims On 8/22/05, Jesse Pelton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I may just be an old dog incapable of learning new tricks, but I've had > a hard time trying to figure out some things since Xerces moved to > Subversion. (I don't remember what specific problems I've had, > unfortunately, just that I had a hard time with something that would > have been trivial for me with CVS.) > > On the other hand, there may be something to be gained by using the same > version control system as other Apache projects. This argument would be > more convincing to me if there was some official indication that ASF > prefers SVN to CVS, but I can't find any such on > http://www.apache.org/dev/version-control.html. > > Is there a compelling reason to make the change? I know SVN is newer > and cooler and has some features that are very useful under some > circumstances (like member moves), but is there any evidence that this > is of value to xml-security? > > I raise these issues just as food for thought. I don't have a vote or a > strong opinion. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Berin Lautenbach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 7:40 AM > > To: security-dev@xml.apache.org > > Subject: SVN > > > > Not sure if everyone is aware, but the ASF is gradually > > converting all > > the CVS repos to SVN. > > > > What are peoples thoughts to moving xml-security to SVN? > -- Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/ - Oxygenating The Web Service Platform
