Although I have reviewed these fixes and they look fine and fairly
low-risk, I think it probably makes sense to allow a few days (a week?)
to let others test and make sure there are no regressions. Comments? I'm
fairly new to the process, but I just think it makes sense to test the
final bits as much as possible before they are released. What are the
guidelines? I don't necessarily think we need to cut an RC2, but we
should at least build an xmlsec.jar and make it available for testing.
--Sean
Vishal Mahajan wrote:
Vishal Mahajan wrote:
Raul,
I have filed three bugs (with suggested patches) - 36638, 36639, and
36640, which I found recently.
I'll check-in the fix for each of these tomorrow
Done with the fixes.
Regards,
Vishal
and after that it's +1 from me.
Regards,
Vishal
Raul Benito wrote:
Sorry for the delay calling a vote but I've been really busy with my
day job(deadline approaching) and I wanted to close all bugs before
doing the release (thing that I manage to do tonight).
But after a waiting time, and with all the bugs closed, I'll think is
time to graduate 1.3RC1 to release status.
What do you thing?
[ ] +1 , OK go ahead.
[ ] +0, [ ] -1, Why we don't do RC2 before.
Regards,
Raul
