I was also going to suggest a RC2 jar, for testing. I'll think that doing a RC jar right now is the best way to test the changes (There are a lot of people interested in testing that are afraid of generate themselves a jar).
So hat do you all think if I go ahead and do a RC2.jar and after two weeks call for another release vote? Regards, Raul On 9/14/05, Vishal Mahajan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think your suggestion makes complete sense. We should give at least a > week of testing (after significant check-ins) before an RC goes out and > probably little more time before for the final release. Thanks for > bringing this up and hopefully we can incorporate this going forward. > > Regards, > > Vishal > > Sean Mullan wrote: > > > Although I have reviewed these fixes and they look fine and fairly > > low-risk, I think it probably makes sense to allow a few days (a > > week?) to let others test and make sure there are no regressions. > > Comments? I'm fairly new to the process, but I just think it makes > > sense to test the final bits as much as possible before they are > > released. What are the guidelines? I don't necessarily think we need > > to cut an RC2, but we should at least build an xmlsec.jar and make it > > available for testing. > > > > --Sean > > > > Vishal Mahajan wrote: > > > >> Vishal Mahajan wrote: > >> > >>> Raul, > >>> > >>> I have filed three bugs (with suggested patches) - 36638, 36639, and > >>> 36640, which I found recently. > >>> I'll check-in the fix for each of these tomorrow > >> > >> > >> > >> Done with the fixes. > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> Vishal > >> > >>> and after that it's +1 from me. > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> > >>> Vishal > >>> > >>> Raul Benito wrote: > >>> > >>>> Sorry for the delay calling a vote but I've been really busy with my > >>>> day job(deadline approaching) and I wanted to close all bugs before > >>>> doing the release (thing that I manage to do tonight). > >>>> > >>>> But after a waiting time, and with all the bugs closed, I'll think is > >>>> time to graduate 1.3RC1 to release status. > >>>> > >>>> What do you thing? > >>>> > >>>> [ ] +1 , OK go ahead. > >>>> [ ] +0, [ ] -1, Why we don't do RC2 before. > >>>> > >>>> Regards, > >>>> > >>>> Raul > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > -- http://r-bg.com
