Al

On 10/11/24 1:57 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 11/10/2024 17:52, Dominik Psenner wrote:
Gary, I can well remember those days. I think we were able to handle it
quite well even if we had no disaster recovery plan at hands. However, that
was a zero day exploit in the wild.

Unfortunately, directed attacks are a lot nastier. Imagine a mail bot
spamming all mailbox to the storage limit within minutes. There are many
other rather simple methods to achieve effective DOS.

In a volunteer organization of individuals doing stuff in their freetime,
simple things like an international call are unfeasible. I estimate a call from italy to usa to be ~ 1.48€ / 1.62$ per minute. Frankly, I wouldn't do
that but rather get my family and friends a pizza with free drinks. Sorry
Gary, dont expect long talks with me by phone. :-))

Phone numbers support more than phone calls. The Tomcat PMC tends to use signal to plan meeting up for meals etc when at conferences etc (zero cost assuming you have data or WiFi) but you still need the phone number to ID the contact.

To address some of the other points that have been made.

Having a back-up communication channel is the important bit. The how can be up to the PMC. Think "How would we co-ordinate a security fix and/or a release if we didn't have ASF communication channels?".

My expectation for Tomcat - just as an example - is that we'd use signal to coordinate what we were going to do which would probably be email with our direct addresses on the CC and lots of "Reply all". But it could be Slack. Or we could just stay on signal (might encourage us to keep messages short). We might even fallback to IRC.

As long as there is a back-up communication channel you can use it to coordinate moving from non-working ASF channels to whatever is the most appropriate for the PMC in the circumstances.

Closing the loop a little on this, here. It seems there is no consensus, so I guess nothing to recommend to PMCs.

Here's what the Tomcat PMC has chosen to implement:

Simple text file in private repo: contacts.txt

This is an opt-in list of PMC members and their self-asserted mobile telephone numbers with the expectation that the method of communication with be via Signal message with a fallback to SMS. It includes a flag for "Security Only" so that we can feel free to use those contacts for e.g. coordinating beer at conferences.

So far, 7 PMC members have opted-in to give their contact information. This includes all of the most active PMC members. Fortunately, all recent security issues have been (a) minor and (b) easily handled via our typical email channels.

Maybe we could use the next opportunity as a test-run, I suppose.

-chris


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: security-discuss-unsubscr...@community.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: security-discuss-h...@community.apache.org

Reply via email to