[ Taking directory-discuss off the TO field, as requested by John and Donald. ]
> When I say the GNU Radio Foundation, Inc. violates "freedom 0" > from the "What is free software?" article, You don't say that. Software freedom applies to software only. > Calling out the violation is > nothing more than a name-and-shame activity to compel voluntary action > by anyone who cares about freedom 0. Software is required to be free to be a part of GNU. Fixing its freedom violations is obligatory. Svetlana
