Alfred, [ We were asked to not include directory-discuss in this discussion. I am removing it. ]
"Alfred M. Szmidt" <[email protected]> wrote: > When a GFDL is packaged with *some* documentation (any at all), I > believe the GFDL becomes enforceable. And consequently, the act of > excluding some documentation from the package then becomes legally > actionable, and rightly so. > > Removing documentation from a software program is legal, and protected > under the four software freedoms. The issue is not about excluding documentation from the program. The alleged "violation" relates to gnuradio.org using cloudflare, so that TOR users face a proprietary captcha and are unable to get a copy of the program or its documentation from the official website. These users still are able to download a copy of the program via other means, such as from a distribution packages source archives. Svetlana
