Nicolas Williams wrote: > Yes, we're going to need to update pam_eval() to search relative config > name paths not just in /usr/lib/security, but also some other place > where customers can place their snippets. I don't know that /etc/pam.d > is a good idea for that (since it has the semantic that file names in > there are service names too), but I'd live with that.
I wouldn't use /etc/pam.d/ for this. > Should I post an update to PSARC/2005/275 about this, or do it later? Lets work it out as part of the mythical future case that delivers /etc/pam.d/ -- Darren J Moffat
