On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 05:22:07PM +0100, Darren J Moffat wrote: > Nicolas Williams wrote: > >Yes, we're going to need to update pam_eval() to search relative config > >name paths not just in /usr/lib/security, but also some other place > >where customers can place their snippets. I don't know that /etc/pam.d > >is a good idea for that (since it has the semantic that file names in > >there are service names too), but I'd live with that. > > I wouldn't use /etc/pam.d/ for this.
/etc/pam/? :) > >Should I post an update to PSARC/2005/275 about this, or do it later? > > Lets work it out as part of the mythical future case that delivers > /etc/pam.d/ OK.
