Casper.Dik at Sun.COM wrote:
> >Tony Nguyen wrote:
> >> The updated and incremental webrevs are at:
> >>
> >> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~tonyn/firewall29Oct2008/
> >>
> >> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~tonyn/firewall-inc/
> >>
> >> The original webrev is still available at:
> >>
> >> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~tonyn/firewall/
> >
> >Before starting to comment on the scripts: Is it mandatory for the
> >firewall SMF scripts to use /sbin/sh or is /usr/bin/ksh acceptable, too
> >?
> 
> Possibly if you make sure that /usr is mounted first.

The scripts already use stuff like "sed" ([1]) and AFAIK that means they
depend on /usr being mounted.

[1]=my main concern is that this script could be slighty reworked to
avoid depending on "sed"&co. just to dismantle one single string -
builtin shell operators can do the same in a much faster manner (and if
we're allowed to use ksh93 we may be able to fold various calls to
"svcprop" to just one in a similar manner how
http://svn.genunix.org/repos/on/branches/ksh93/gisburn/scripts/svcproptree1.sh
works).

----

Bye,
Roland

-- 
  __ .  . __
 (o.\ \/ /.o) roland.mainz at nrubsig.org
  \__\/\/__/  MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer
  /O /==\ O\  TEL +49 641 3992797
 (;O/ \/ \O;)

Reply via email to