I'm a bit confused as to what the qualifications of the OpenSolaris core 
contributers is suppose to be.  I see many names current and proposed 
that are definite leaders in the Solaris Security community, but I'm not 
sure I see how that is translating to the OpenSolaris community.  The 
active involvement in OpenSolaris security projects, in community 
discussion, etc.

Tony


Glenn Brunette wrote:
> Darren,
> 
> Thank you for taking point on this.  Just to provide a quick pointer,
> the URL referenced in Darren's e-mail is:
> 
> http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/security/contributors/
> 
> I support this proposal.
> 
> g
> 
> 
> Darren J Moffat wrote:
>> We need to update our contributor and core contributor grants list for 
>> the up and coming election and because it is the time of the year when 
>> apparently we are supposed to do this.  As your nominated community 
>> facilitator I'm starting the public community discussion on this.
>>
>> The current list of contributors can be found by going to
>> http://poll.opensolaris.org and sorting by community - when I looked 
>> today the Security grants started on page 11.
>>
>> Some of the existing core contributors have been having some offline 
>> discussion about the criteria we should employee for getting contributor 
>> and core contributor status from the OpenSolaris security community.
>>
>> For some context the ON community is granting most people who have ever 
>> done an ON putback (either directly or sponsored) contributor status and 
>> some people core contributor based on the volume or complexity of their 
>> putbacks.
>>
>> We as a community need to choose how the Security Community of 
>> OpenSolaris grants contributor and core contributor status.
>>
>> Until now we have done this on a rather ad-hoc basis roughtly based on 
>> contributions to projects sponsored by Security community and hosted on 
>> OpenSolaris - there have been some exceptions.  A model similar to what 
>> the ON community has done is more appropriate in some peoples view in 
>> that indirect contribution should be acknowledged as well.   In think in 
>> reality we need a hybrid of the two particularly to distinguish 
>> contributor from core contributor.
>>
>> Rather than spend endless hours of further discussion I've updated the 
>> security community contributors page[1] with my first cut of a set of 
>> new and changed grants.
>>
>> Only the existing core contributors can actually vote but I'm more than 
>> happy to have input from all existing and potential contributors.  If 
>> anyone believes they, or someone else, have been missed out or 
>> incorrectly classified please do speak up it was likely an unintended 
>> omission on my part.  This is just an initial draft and I fully expect 
>> it to change.  I want to acknowledge that it isn't just engineers 
>> writing code that contribute.  In particular I'd like to see nominations 
>> for non Sun engineers getting contributor status via this community if 
>> anyone believes someone deserves that.
>>
>> Lets try and wrap this all up by Friday 15th Feb.
>>
> 


Reply via email to