Dan McDonald wrote: > On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 04:09:28PM +0000, Darren J Moffat wrote: >> Should we include the FreeRADIUS server in OpenSolaris (probably in the >> SFW consolidation) ? >> >> Should we include the FreeRADIUS PAM module in OpenSolaris (either SFW >> or ON) ? >> >> Any technical reason why we shouldn't do this ? > > Is it just a library or PAM module? If so, I see no good reason to stop > FreeRADIUS from landing in SFW (or even ON).
There are two separate bundles of stuff. The FreeRADIUS server (GPLv2 license) and the FreeRADIUS library (LGPLv2.1 license) in one bundle. The FreeRADIUS PAM module (GPLv2) in another. The PAM module comes with its own MD5 implementation but it won't be used on Solaris since we already have libmd (which has the same function signature). The server I think should be in SFW the PAM module I'm happy either way for SFW or ON. The only reason for ON for the PAM module is that I know the code needs slight modification (which is still possible for SFW). -- Darren J Moffat