Darren J Moffat wrote:
> Dan McDonald wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 04:09:28PM +0000, Darren J Moffat wrote:
>>
>>> Should we include the FreeRADIUS server in OpenSolaris (probably in the
>>> SFW consolidation) ?
>>>
>>> Should we include the FreeRADIUS PAM module in OpenSolaris (either SFW
>>> or ON) ?
>>>
>>> Any technical reason why we shouldn't do this ?
>>>
>> Is it just a library or PAM module? If so, I see no good reason to stop
>> FreeRADIUS from landing in SFW (or even ON).
>>
>
> There are two separate bundles of stuff.
>
> The FreeRADIUS server (GPLv2 license) and the FreeRADIUS library
> (LGPLv2.1 license) in one bundle.
>
> The FreeRADIUS PAM module (GPLv2) in another. The PAM module comes with
> its own MD5 implementation but it won't be used on Solaris since we
> already have libmd (which has the same function signature).
>
Hmm... PAM modules are dynamically linked. Our PAM implementation is
not GLDv2. It sounds to me like this might present a licensing conflict?
-- Garrett
