+1 Darren J Moffat wrote: > I've given this a lot of thought and I've finally come a conclusion. > > Ideally I would prefer to see more (maybe not all) the changes that JASS > makes to the default configuration made the default configuration in the > relevant consolidations (mostly this is ON). My recent thread on > stronger password defaults is a step in that direction. However until > such times as we have done that AND we have somewhere in the system the > equivalent of the JASS auditing (config check) capability I think we > need JASS to continue. > > So I'm supporting this project with the main goal of it being to > actually get as much as possible out of JASS and make it smaller as time > goes on. I would like to see the new JASS project team work with the > SMF and Install communities/projects to achieve this, with the ultimate > goal being JASS is no longer a separate component or feature. > > I think we do need a source repository for this but I'm not sure about > the need for a separate mailing list from security-discuss - in fact > given that the goal is integration and the amount of work that needs to > be done with other opensolaris.org communities I think a separate list > initially would be detrimental to that goal. > > So: +1 > > -- > Darren J Moffat > _______________________________________________ > security-discuss mailing list > security-discuss at opensolaris.org
-- Glenn Brunette Distinguished Engineer Director, GSS Security Office Sun Microsystems, Inc.
