On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 10:19:34AM +0000, Darren J Moffat wrote:
> Ideally I would prefer to see more (maybe not all) the changes that JASS 
> makes to the default configuration made the default configuration in the 
> relevant consolidations (mostly this is ON).

+1 for turning up the level of paranoia ;) No, serioulsy - there's a
long history of default settings most suitable for protected lan
environments and I'm all for any efforts towards a real secure by
default install that covers all aspects of security.

> My recent thread on 
> stronger password defaults is a step in that direction.  However until 
> such times as we have done that AND we have somewhere in the system the 
> equivalent of the JASS auditing (config check) capability I think we 
> need JASS to continue.
> 
I do generally agree and one little thing that speaks in favor of
keeping JASS around for even longer is to make it simple to switch
between different security levels. Not that I think changing profile
would be something you do every day, but in a time when running solaris
on a laptop isn't entirely implausible, I could imagine wanting to relax
things a bit when jumpstarting servers on a crossover cable. 

> So I'm supporting this project with the main goal of it being to 
> actually get as much as possible out of JASS and make it smaller as time 
> goes on.   I would like to see the new JASS project team work with the 
> SMF and Install communities/projects to achieve this, with the ultimate 
> goal being JASS is no longer a separate component or feature.
> 
Makes a lot of sense although I still think "ownership" belongs in the
security community.

> I think we do need a source repository for this but I'm not sure about 
> the need for a separate mailing list from security-discuss - in fact 
> given that the goal is integration and the amount of work that needs to 
> be done with other opensolaris.org communities I think a separate list 
> initially would be detrimental to that goal.
> 
Agreed. That could always change if the traffic grows enough to sustain
a seperate list.

> So: +1
> 
+1 as well from my spot in the peanut gallery.

vh

Mads Toftum
-- 
http://soulfood.dk

Reply via email to