On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 09:46:44AM +0000, Ceri Davies wrote: > > I think a KSH93 version of smf_include.sh that uses more built-ins would > > be great, but then we'd have to manage code duplication until the day > > arrives that we feel fine mandating KSH93 for SMF method scripts. I > > wouldn't mind that code duplication, but others might. > > I think the performance improvement that ksh93 could bring would make a > very interesting RFE. I don't really think it's this project's job.
I agree. I did not mean to imply otherwise. I think we can safely put this sub-thread to rest :)
