Ceri Davies wrote: > On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 12:26:17PM -0600, Nicolas Williams wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 06:56:24PM +0100, Roland Mainz wrote: [snip] > > I think a KSH93 version of smf_include.sh that uses more built-ins would > > be great, but then we'd have to manage code duplication until the day > > arrives that we feel fine mandating KSH93 for SMF method scripts. I > > wouldn't mind that code duplication, but others might. > > I think the performance improvement that ksh93 could bring would make a > very interesting RFE.
I don't have the time to do this _alone_ in a seperate RFE - the extra overhead eats-up too much time currently. I'll be more efficient (at least for me) to cleanup the script code _now_ (starting with fixing the warnings+errors listed by "shlint" and then do some profiling). > I don't really think it's this project's job. What about the startup time regression ? IMO six seconds are too much. ---- Bye, Roland -- __ . . __ (o.\ \/ /.o) roland.mainz at nrubsig.org \__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer /O /==\ O\ TEL +49 641 3992797 (;O/ \/ \O;)
