Peter Memishian wrote: > > validate_interface could just do 'dladm show-dev $1 > /dev/null > > 2>&1' and test the result. > > With the caveat that show-dev disappeared in build 105 (but it probably > wasn't what validate_interface was looking for anyway, given that it keyed > off of device names, not datalinks or IP interfaces). I'd need to know > what validate_interface is trying to do to suggest an alternative approach. >
Hi Meem, Given an interface name, validate_interface verifies it's a valid physical interface on the system. Looks like 'dladm show-phys' is what I need. Let me know if there's better alternative. Thanks in advance, tony
