Dear Harry,

at this time, we have not issued any noise estimates of our system but we are 
preparing a variety of material for realease over the next few weeks. I would rather 
not be giving out previews yet, so stay posted!

cheers
Mark


-----Original Message-----
From: HAROLD SEIGEL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, 21 May 2000 14:07
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SEGMIN]: BHP's Airborne Gravity Gradiometer System


Dear Mark:
What would you state as the noise level of your gradiometer, in terms of
SD of the mean, averaged over a particular time interval, with aircraft
tubulence envelope of a particular number of g's?
Harry Seigel

"Dransfield, Mark MH" wrote:
> 
> Hello Peter,
> 
> not a dumb question at all. While gravity gradiometers require essentially no free 
>air or Bouguer slab correction, the terrain correction is very important and an 
>accurate topographic model is required. My PhD thesis (Airborne Gravity Gradiometry, 
>University of Western Australia, 1994) briefly mentions the topic giving rough 
>estimates of the requirement. A paper by Chen and Macnae (Explor. Geophys., 1997, 
>p21-25) looks at a particular example and there are older references in Geophys. (eg 
>Chinnery, 196? and Hammer 19??).
> 
> I can tell you that the BHP system deals with this problem very well!
> 
> cheers
> Mark
> 
> ===================================================================
> Dr Mark Dransfield                              ph. +61-3 9609 4478
> BHP Minerals Technology                         fax +61-3 9609 4489
> Discovery Technologies
> Level 17, 114 William Street, Melbourne
> GPO Box 86A, Melbourne, VIC, 3001
> AUSTRALIA                             [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ===================================================================
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Walker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, 19 May 2000 23:28
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SEGMIN]: BHP's Airborne Gravity Gradiometer System
> 
> Hi Ken
> 
> Perhaps this is a dumb question, but since a gradiomenter
> is essentially a shallow penetrating instrument (compared
> with the field), and since the largest effect has to be the
> contrast at the air-earth interface, won't the gradiomenter
> be inordinately sensitive to topography? Ie: to tease geologic
> signal from the data, will it not be necessary to have a very
> accurate topographic model?
> 
> Peter
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ken Witherly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Segmin@Lists. Geosoft. Com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2000 7:37 PM
> Subject: [SEGMIN]: BHP's Airborne Gravity Gradiometer System
> 
> > BHP announced yesterday that their airborne gravity gradiometer system is
> > flying. The attached JPEG is from a local (Melbourne) newspaper. The url
> > leads to the full talk (lots of other BHP bumf), there are some additional
> > images showing data from Ekati and Western Australia. Enjoy.
> >
> > Ken Witherly
> >
> > http://www.bhp.com.au/financials/brief/default.htm
> >
> >
> > Condor Consulting, Inc.
> > St. 206, 4860 Robb Street
> > Wheat Ridge CO 80033
> > Tel: 303-423-8475
> > Fax: 303-423-9729
> > www.condorconsult.com
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________________
> > List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
> >
> >
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________________
> List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
> 
> EOM
> 
> NOTICE - This message contains information intended only for the use of the 
>addressee named above.  It may also be confidential and/or privileged.  If you are 
>not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that you must not 
>disseminate, copy or take any action in reliance on it.  If you have received this 
>message in error please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> _______________________________________________________
> List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
_______________________________________________________
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

EOM 

NOTICE - This message contains information intended only for the use of the addressee 
named above.  It may also be confidential and/or privileged.  If you are not the 
intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that you must not 
disseminate, copy or take any action in reliance on it.  If you have received this 
message in error please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________________
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

Reply via email to