Re Slingram etymology

In settling on loop frame as the translation of Slingram, I think the discussion slipped off target. The online dictionaries are trying to make a one-to-one match between words in the two languages, but losing some meaning in what is bound to be an imperfect process. Sling in swedish is from the same root as sling in english.  As I understand it (likely imperfectly), loop is a good english translation when one is referring to a flexible loop for lifting things or simply a closed path. Ram translates OK as frame, if one means a solid frame, framework, or the enclosing fixed boundary of something, and it could appropriately describe a coil winding on a fixed substrate.

In summer 1959 at Outokumpu, Finland, I worked with data from many 10's of square kilometers of intensive Slingram (HLEM) surveying.  I was told that Slingram was best translated as "carried loop" or "slung loop"; describing how each of the two circular air -cored horizontal loops were slung by straps from the operators' shoulders. This was a contrast with earlier EM's where coils were usually tripod mounted. I was also shown a famous picture of a mobile version of HLEM used in Lapland, where the systems coils were mounted on sleds pulled by reindeer.

Certainly, Slingram and Turam were developed in Sweden well before 1950, as described in several posts of this series.

Early (pre 1960s) EM systems were single frequency, and had minimal electronics (limited to simple oscillators to generate the Tx current and simple amplifiers to make the received signal audible in headphones). Measurements were made with compensators, essentially two dial AC bridges that had to be adjusted manually to annul the headphone signal and then the data read from the potentiometer dials.

An alternative to Slingram at the time was Turam (two loop). It used a large, usually rectangular, fixed horizontal loop as the transmitter, with a moving receiver system traversing lines usually directed outside and away from the Tx loop. The Rx consisted of two vertical axis loops separated by one or more stations. This allowed one to measure the complex ratio of the vertical field components at the two stations with a compensator. Then, if desired, one could calculate back to the complex field amplitude at individual stations. Bob Bosschart's PhD was the bible for it.

By the late '50's, all kinds of alternatives were being marketed for exploration to order of 30 m. Most were only single frequency, and used ~ 1kHz.  This had the important S/N advantage of being within the sferics amplitude minimum, but was mainly suitable for small scale surveying in terrain of low conductivity, e.g. glaciated precambrian shield). Stan Ward's PhD (~1955) was about 20 Hz to 20 kHz field tests to find an optimum frequency. Jim Wait's PhD at U of T's Electrical Engineering Dept provided the theoretical background for understanding its role.

I especially want to second the remarks about Jack Betz' formidable contributions to the very robust, multi-frequency version of Slingram designed mid 70's by Apex Parametrics and called Max-Min (referring to the fact that one could use it as a maximum or minimum coupled system).  Jack provided innumerable excellent example field responses with detailed interpretations; all very well supported by scale modelling studies to show how one could differentiate overburden and host rock responses from those of localized conductors. It was pioneering work in EM interpretation and an inspirations for our work on UTEM. Some of his reports are still available at U. of T.  I haven't seen or heard from him in several years, but I believe he is still enjoying retirement in rural Ontario.

Regards Gordon West

-----------------------
SEGMIN community mailing list service ([email protected]).
Change your personal options here: 
https://lists.geosoft.com/mailman/options/segmin/archive%40mail-archive.com
Colleagues can join here: https://lists.geosoft.com/mailman/listinfo/segmin
Archives: https://lists.geosoft.com/mailman/private/segmin/
NOTE that <Reply> will reply to all members of the list.

Reply via email to