Hi, I suppose it's somewhat a bug, although I don't think a severe one. The general philosophy has been that a subcategory shouldn't exist unless its pages' data structure is in some way different from that of the parent category's pages, and thus would require a different template and form: otherwise, the pages could belong to the main category and just have a semantic property that differentiates them from the rest. In other words, there should usually a one-to-one correspondence between categories, templates and forms.
-Yaron On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 1:30 AM, Stephen Larson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > Hi, > > Is there a way to make the "edit with forms" tab show up for sub- > categories of a category that has been declared with the "has default > form" property? My experience so far is that only simple pages within > a category get the "edit with forms". Is this the intended > functionality, or do I have a bug? > > Thanks, > Stephen > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Semantic Forms" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/semantic-forms?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
