Actually, I'm looking at it right now and it's not clear if we don't want
LocalSearch - it's most likely that we don't want a bubble to display a link
and directions links that lead to Google Maps site, but having a list of
reasults is still good - I mean it does geocoding in addition to the
localsearch so all results are included.

I've made a prototype for the feature with two different callbacks - one on
the click in the search result list and another one on result marker click:
http://www.sergeychernyshev.com/SemanticGoogleMapsPrototype.html

Check it out and let me know if this makes sense.

              Sergey


On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Sergey Chernyshev <
[email protected]> wrote:

> I'm not positive about it - it's possible that control might be customized.
> I'll take a look at it.
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 6:40 PM, [email protected] <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>>
>> Sure, but I don't think it's possible.
>>
>> -Yaron
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> Date: Monday, February 02, 2009 6:09:53 pm
>> To: [email protected]
>> From: "Sergey Chernyshev" <[email protected]>
>> Subject: [Semantic Forms] Re: Improving the Semantic Google Maps form
>>  input
>>
>> Actually, being outside of the map, local search makes it confusing and
>> that's the problem of original and new solution so I think best bet would
>> be
>> to move it inside the map.
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Yaron Koren <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > Okay, I made a version of this change on Discourse DB:
>> >
>> > http://discoursedb.org/w/index.php?title=London&action=formedit
>> >
>> > Does this improve things at all? Or would a more radical change be
>> better?
>> >
>> > -Yaron
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Yaron Koren <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Well, in the change I'm talking about, the "local search" input would
>> not
>> >> be on the map, but under the map, just as it is now - only the text
>> would be
>> >> different.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Sergey Chernyshev <
>> >> [email protected]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Yep, that's what what I was actually looking for - to have interface
>> like
>> >>> local search (text field and button on the map) but make it perform
>> >>> geocoding instead.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Yaron Koren <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> Yeah, that LocalSearch is a very intuitive interface. The fact that
>> you
>> >>>> can't set the text, and thus change the language, might be a
>> deal-breaker,
>> >>>> though.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> What about just making the existing address-lookup input look more
>> like
>> >>>> LocalSearch's? I'm imaging something that looks like this:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> ----------------------
>> >>>> | Search the map     |  Search
>> >>>> ----------------------
>> >>>>
>> >>>> (Hopefully that fixed-width formatting showed up correctly.) The
>> input
>> >>>> itself contains a gray "Search the map" string, that disappears as
>> soon as
>> >>>> the user clicks in the input; then there's a "Search" button or link
>> next to
>> >>>> it that the user presses to do the actual lookup.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Potential solution?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> -Yaron
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Sergey Chernyshev <
>> >>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> Yep, I agree - clearing the input seems odd if you clear the input,
>> but
>> >>>>> if it's kept, then it's not clear to the user why that address is
>> not saved,
>> >>>>> but coordinates instead - this can be solved by the in-pan control
>> like
>> >>>>> Local Search or similar where it's sort-of clear that this window is
>> only
>> >>>>> for looking stuff up.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> As for reverse geocoding, I think it well depends on the use case -
>> for
>> >>>>> things like specifying location for the event, it makes sense to
>> know where
>> >>>>> it is but not knowing the address or another example - when you need
>> to post
>> >>>>> location of the address of the Deli you go to every day - you know
>> where it
>> >>>>> is on the map, but has no idea about coordinates or address. The
>> question is
>> >>>>> if it should be used for entering map coordinates or for entering
>> addresses
>> >>>>> (another type of data).
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>           Sergey
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Yaron Koren <[email protected]
>> >wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> Thanks for this feedbac
>>
>>
>> >>
>>
>
>
> --
> Sergey Chernyshev
> http://www.sergeychernyshev.com/
>



-- 
Sergey Chernyshev
http://www.sergeychernyshev.com/

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Semantic Forms" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/semantic-forms?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to