> - #info not working in forms - yeah, that's a bug/omission in SF; I guess no > one had tried inserting tooltips into forms until now. :)
It's an OK feature that I'd use if it could be made to work -thanks! > - property stuff - it's fine to say something like "a page cannot be > considered a country unless it has a population specified"; that's what > mandatory fields are for. But what you seem to be arguing for is something > like "a page cannot be considered a country unless it has either a > population *or* a capital specified". That just seems odd to me, and I can't > imagine that there's any corresponding concept in OWL. Unless I'm > misunderstanding something. To take a less childish example, Yoren is not considered an "Educated Person" only and until Yoren possesses an attribute that indicates an adequate level of schooling... get it now? To point to mandatory fields as a viable alternative is to ignore that a "mandatory field" in an SF form has the SAME EFFECT as specifying a "mandatory class" for the page. I'd agree that this approach is not "conventional" from a perspective of single inheritance, but the RDF is designed specifically for multiple inheritance, envisioning exactly what I am doing; and SMW certainly accommodates multiple inheritance, and I thought that SF would also. Odd or not, my friend, it's what I am doing, with good results so far, so it'd be kinda nice if you could appreciate more a developer creating a sophisticated model who really wants to showcase SF technology. > - "add another" - yeah, it's true that someone could accidentally click on > "add another" a bunch of times, and the system should probably ignore all > but one blank value; I wouldn't call it a "serious problem", but I guess > that's a matter of opinion. Well I don't understand why you'd want to ignore all but one blank value -- they should ALL be ignored, at the developer's option of course (via no-null-call). And is this a serious problem? I''ve given two serious reasons why it's a serious problem IMHO: user confusion and wasteful processing. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Semantic Forms" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/semantic-forms?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
