On 09/21/2010 04:02 PM, Markus Krötzsch wrote: > On 20/09/2010 16:17, Samuel Lampa wrote: >> Also there is more interesting stuff that would be nice to add to the >> current SMWWriter/POM functionality, such as ability to update facts >> annotated via template calls (so that one can present imported >> information nicely via templates ... something I'd really need in my >> current work) etc. > > Indeed. But regarding such improvements, I was wondering about the > future ownership of these extensions in general. Is Denny going to take > over the maintenance, or are you going to remain active maintaining your > code after GSoC?
I'd be much interested in keeping managing it (in collaboration with Denny and others who are interested) especially as there are still improvements/features I would like to see implemented for use cases I'm involved in etc. In general, within 1 month or so I should know more about my occupation for the next year(s) (looking for jobs now), which might affect the amount of time I can put on this, but I can come back with an update when I know. // Samuel -- Samuel Lampa --------------------------------------- Student @ Uppsala University Blog: http://saml.rilspace.org --------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using them to simplify application deployment and accelerate your shift to cloud computing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ Semediawiki-devel mailing list Semediawiki-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/semediawiki-devel