On 09/21/2010 04:02 PM, Markus Krötzsch wrote:
> On 20/09/2010 16:17, Samuel Lampa wrote:
>> Also there is more interesting stuff that would be nice to add to the
>> current SMWWriter/POM functionality, such as ability to update facts
>> annotated via template calls (so that one can present imported
>> information nicely via templates ... something I'd really need in my
>> current work) etc.
>
> Indeed. But regarding such improvements, I was wondering about the
> future ownership of these extensions in general. Is Denny going to take
> over the maintenance, or are you going to remain active maintaining your
> code after GSoC?

I'd be much interested in keeping managing it (in collaboration with 
Denny and others who are interested) especially as there are still 
improvements/features I would like to see implemented for use cases I'm 
involved in etc.

In general, within 1 month or so I should know more about my occupation 
for the next year(s) (looking for jobs now), which might affect the 
amount of time I can put on this, but I can come back with an update 
when I know.

// Samuel

-- 
Samuel Lampa
---------------------------------------
      Student @ Uppsala University
    Blog: http://saml.rilspace.org
---------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
and start using them to simplify application deployment and
accelerate your shift to cloud computing.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
Semediawiki-devel mailing list
Semediawiki-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/semediawiki-devel

Reply via email to