Thanks to Denny for his earlier thoughts and to you, Markus, for this  
follow-up. I've decided that I'll wait until the release of 0.7. Hope  
all the intense code-hammering goes well for you in the interim.

I'll be happy to provide any desired feedback on the installation  
process for 0.7 when the time comes. I figure that the most valuable  
contribution I can make to SMW at this point is to give voice to the  
impressions of a completely new user with little programming or  
database expertise. (Which, of course, is precisely what I am!) Just  
let me know.

Thanks again,

Nate

On 25 Mar 07, at 7.45 AM, Markus Krötzsch wrote:

> Maybe some more on our release plans for 0.7. We are currently  
> changing many
> things, both internally and w.r.t. certain user interfaces. But the  
> plan is
> to release SMW 0.7 shortly after MediaWiki 1.10 is out (maybe in  
> one or two
> weeks, if I am not mistaken). Since 0.7 is expected to greatly  
> simplify
> installation, waiting for it might have some benefits, but later  
> upgrade
> should be no problem either.
>
> The only task that appears to be critical for the release are a  
> couple of UI
> changes Denny currently implements. If those are stable, I see no  
> problem in
> releasing 0.7.
>
> -- Markus
>
> On Monday 19 March 2007 18:23, Denny Vrandecic wrote:
>> Hi Nate, Hi Günther,
>>
>> thanks for your interest and your kind words.
>>
>> The changes that Markus mentioned are indeed severe -- but only under
>> the hood. Our development strategy is to always be able to point  
>> to the
>> current SVN version and say "Hey, you can use that!" -- and that's  
>> what
>> I would encourage anyway. We have now a simple "Update" Button inside
>> the wiki, so basically all you need to do is update the SVN and  
>> click on
>> that one button. That's at least what we hope :)
>>
>> We don't know for sure when 0.7 will be released. Releasing means  
>> for us
>> to take a snapshot of the wiki and tag a new version number to it.  
>> There
>> are no extra tests run on that. Although we do plan to set up  
>> regression
>> tests and some other goodies very soon! But this again will be  
>> something
>> that the SVN version will also benefit from. Actually, the whole  
>> notion
>> of releases is somewhat outdated on the web today...
>>
>> With regards to the n-ary relations: we are currently investigating
>> possible solutions for this problem, and we plan to implement one of
>> them in a medium time frame. If you have a clever idea how to  
>> represent
>> n-ary relations in a generic and still user friendly way, please  
>> tell us
>> so! We didn't find a solution everyone's happy with yet.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> denny
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I would like to second Nate's thanks to the SMW developers and
>>> contributers.
>>>
>>> I'm also rather new to SMW and have a similar problem/question. I  
>>> want to
>>> use SMW for biological annotation data. It looks for me difficult to
>>> accomplish that without using n-ary relations. I came across  
>>> BOWiki which
>>> used SMW 0.4 as basis to integrate and support n-ary relations  
>>> but as far
>>> as I can see their changes are so severe that it is now a different,
>>> alternative semantic extention to MediaWiki, incompatible with  
>>> SMW and so
>>> any improvements in SMW couldn't be used there.
>>>
>>> So my question would be if there are any plans to implement  
>>> something
>>> similar like BOWiki did in SMW to allow n-ary relations or if  
>>> there is
>>> maybe a practical way to use constructs (as suggested in the W3C  
>>> Working
>>> Group article) to implement n-ary like behaviour in SMW resp.  
>>> specify
>>> some sort of qualifiers for a relation?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Günther
>>>
>>> Quoting Nate Olson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>>> Greetings, all,
>>>>
>>>> Over the past month I've been learning about SMW bit by bit, and I
>>>> plan to use it as part of a Web-based project I'll be launching
>>>> shortly. First things first: My sincere thanks for all the effort
>>>> that many have devoted to the project. Even to this SemWeb novice,
>>>> it's very cool stuff, and I'm excited to see how it shapes up in  
>>>> the
>>>> coming months.
>>>>
>>>> Second, a basic question: Given current development work and the  
>>>> road
>>>> map for stable releases, would you recommend to someone like me to
>>>> simply wait until version .7 is released before I even begin using
>>>> SMW at all? In other words, are the changes in the .7 code
>>>> substantial enough, and is the estimated release date of .7 close
>>>> enough, to wait it out?
>>>>
>>>> My question is prompted by mentions of various code changes  
>>>> sprinkled
>>>> around the mailing lists, and perhaps especially by this post from
>>>> Markus: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?
>>>> msg_id=38122827. I'm in a situation where I can afford to wait a
>>>> little while, but on the other hand, if the costs of waiting to
>>>> "build out" my SMW-enabled wiki outweigh the benefits, I'd obviousy
>>>> rather get on with it!
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for your time, and I look forward to our discussions  
>>>> ahead. :)
>>>>
>>>> All best,
>>>>
>>>> Nate
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>>>> -----
>>>> - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
>>>> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance  
>>>> to share
>>>> your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and  
>>>> earn
>>>> cash
>>>> http://www.techsay.com/default.php? 
>>>> page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDE
>>>> V _______________________________________________
>>>> Semediawiki-user mailing list
>>>> Semediawiki-user@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/semediawiki-user
>>>
>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>>> -----
>>> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
>>> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to  
>>> share
>>> your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and  
>>> earn cash
>>> http://www.techsay.com/default.php? 
>>> page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Semediawiki-user mailing list
>>> Semediawiki-user@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/semediawiki-user
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>> ----
>> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
>> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to  
>> share
>> your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and  
>> earn cash
>> http://www.techsay.com/default.php? 
>> page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
>> _______________________________________________
>> Semediawiki-user mailing list
>> Semediawiki-user@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/semediawiki-user
>
> -- 
> Markus Krötzsch
> Institute AIFB, University of Karlsruhe, D-76128 Karlsruhe
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]        phone +49 (0)721 608 7362
> www.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/WBS/     fax +49 (0)721 693  717


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Semediawiki-user mailing list
Semediawiki-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/semediawiki-user

Reply via email to