Hello.
How you say that Garfield (an individual) is a Cat (a collection of 
individuals)?
If you use the same relation "is a" you might be in logical 
troubles....you need other role like "belongs-to" or "instance-of"...
Mammal or Cat are collections of individuals... but Garfield is an 
individual.
Normally, we try to keep separate the collections and the individuals.

The mathematical relation between a category and a simple page is "page 
belongs to Category".
But between a categoy and any subcategory is "subcategory subset of 
Category".

Is not the same part-of or belongs-to that subset-of.

I think that it's better follow a logical point of view at the moment of 
represents the data.


Fernando Carpani.


Emanuele D'Arrigo wrote:

>On 7/4/07, Olivier Dameron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  
>
>>>can a relation "is a" be used to completely replace categories?
>>>Can you think of any advantage/disadvantage with this approach?
>>>      
>>>
>
>  
>
>>"is a" represents specialization (e.g. Cat is-a Mammal, which means
>>that all the instances of Cat are instances of Mammal)
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
>>Categories are organized along the "is a" hierarchy, but also follow
>>the "narrower than / broader than" relation (e.g. Algebra is a
>>subcategory of mathematics), which is more like a kind of part-of
>>    
>>
>
>But then why not to use "is a part of" or is "a type of" instead of
>categories? It seems to me that categories are redundant once
>you have relations, and what's worst, depending on the context,
>they seem to be in-lieu of different type of relations.
>
>I'm confused!
>
>Ciao!
>
>Manu
>
>  
>


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Semediawiki-user mailing list
Semediawiki-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/semediawiki-user

Reply via email to